Respect, Gratitude & Courage

Those three values, according to the symposium’s closing speaker, Doug Burgum, should anchor one’s life.  Mr. Burgum concluded the day of learning with a motivational and humorous presentation.

I believe he appropriately summarized each speaker and focused on what we, as students, can do.  It was a great way to end the symposium.

As a freshman, I was pleasantly surprised with the symposium.  In high school, I had never experienced such an event, so it was particularly enjoyable for me to attend and listen to the speakers.  But the presentations were not the only enjoyable aspect.  Numerous students participated in Question & Answer sessions, including a large group of students in my class.  I was happy to see my classmates participate in this forum, as I believe it is central to the mission of Concordia College.  In the description of the college’s mission, is a perfect summary of what my fellow Cobbers are doing by participating in the symposium.  Whether it be  asking a speaker questions or tweeting on Twitter, Concordia students always find ways to personify the mission of the college.

From the Concordia website (description of mission):

Students who are eager to address big questions, open to the complexity of our multicultural world, and passionate about making a difference in their communities are welcome to be full and active participants in the life of Concordia.

I walk away from the symposium more educated, but also more eager to share the information I have learned with the world.

Posted by:  Matt Hansen ‘13

No Comments Posted in Doug Burgum
Make Sure Your Surgeon Plays Video Games!

Among the many fun facts presented in Dr. Gary Small’s message, was a humorous and insightful study that concluded surgeons who play video games are better prepared for the operating room.  Moreover, action games can improve attention.

Dr. Small added a very interesting perspective to the symposium.  He is a physician and, therefore, presented a lot of his information in a more scientific matter.  Dr. Small described how a young brain is particularly malleable and can acquire a vast amount of skills such as language and music.  He also detailed the positives and negatives of internet use.

Throughout his entire presentation, Small detailed the effects of technology from a neurological perspective and, to me, that really helped make the information more concrete.

Posted by:  Matt Hansen ‘13

No Comments Posted in Gary Small
Brave New World

It was the end of a long day of life-changing lessons. The mood in Memorial was varied from excited and anxious to sore (those seats are NOT conducive to long-term sitting) and disappointment at the closing of the symposium.

I was ready to be done sitting, but saddened to think that the 24 hours of stimulating conversation was coming to a close. At the same time, I  wasn’t sure that another presenter could capture my attention and hold it. I was false.

Burgum effortlessly captured the crowd with his witty six-word recaps of previous speakers and an endearing confession that he wasn’t a practiced public speaker. In simple but powerful language, Burgum captured my attention and stimulated just as much – if not more – thought about the future of technology than the rest of the symposium combined. In short, the jobs my generation will have do not exist yet. The future comes one day at a time and at the rate that social media is changing the way we see ourselves and the world around us, it is impossible to predict what will happen in the next decade.

I appreciated the fact that Burgum didn’t use elaborate terminology or in-depth calculations but rather admitted his inability to understand the world that my generation is inheriting. In some respects, the lack of security for the future is terrifying. However, Burgum’s very liberal arts suggestion of developing a well-rounded character to combat whatever challenges the future may bring, made the future all the less intimidating. And dare I say, more inviting?

In short, this year’s symposium taught me this: Live a life you are proud of. Respect those around you. Have gratitude for the privileged lives we lead. And lastly and perhaps most importantly, have the courage to live a life that changes it all.

Posted by: Gia Rassier ‘10

No Comments Posted in Doug Burgum
We Are the Chosen

I chose to attend the concurrent session presented by Dr. Roland Martinson ‘64 entitled “Cyber Identities and Digital Faith: Fabrication or Authenticity” because I really enjoy thinking about the ways in which social media shapes our daily lives.  I expected to learn about the implications of a world connected by social media. I expected to learn about differences in policies and changes to our various governmental and educational systems because of the media. I expected to discover new issues and problems created by social media. I did not expect to have my faith challenged as drastically as I did listening to the lovable, engaging Dr. Martinson.

During the symposium, all of the speakers alluded to the massive role that social media plays in the lives of my generation, “the millennials.”

So did Dr. Martinson.

However, what struck me so much about this presentation was the challenge, the call to action. Martinson talked about how we are the first generation of truly global citizens, the most culturally diverse, the most socially engaged demographic in history. Listening to him reminded me that despite all of the criticism and accusations of apathy that my generation withstands, most of us are genuinely engaged in the world around us. Because of social media, we have more power to reach across culture, race, religion and even continents than ever before. With that power comes a great responsibility. We are living through a great emergence – a change that will redefine the world’s view of faith born out of a new, more vital form of Christianity. Instead of focusing on orthodox beliefs, this new Christianity will focus on the life and teachings of Christ. It will be less denominational and more global, filled with robust and diverse spiritual traditions – a brand new way of worshiping. My generation will be the leaders of these congregations, these communities, this world. We will welcome strangers and serve with generosity and respect.

And the thing is, we don’t really have a choice. We are that generation, whether we like it or not. It’s not a matter of maybe, or possibly, or “if we work hard enough,” we are. In a short 50-minute session, Dr. Martinson reignited my passion and reminded me of a faith that sometimes gets lost in the hustle of living. I’ve never been more excited to be the change the world sees.

“But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light.” – 1 Peter 2:9

Posted by: Gia Rassier ‘10

No Comments Posted in Roland Martinson
Governing the Internet?

“We’re raising a generation of criminals.”

It sounded kind of harsh as Tracy Mitrano said it, but I understood her point. In the age of the Internet, many people believe everything on the World Wide Web is in the public domain and can be used and shared freely without any regard to copyright.

Considering Mitrano’s other comments, it’s hard to blame the users. The judicial system decided that Internet service providers, ISPs, would not have liability for tort damages and it is hard to determine what other laws apply to fair usage of information on the Web.

“Our laws have been very slow to keep up with this…technology,” Mitrano said.

Her suggestion was to have a federal government agency devoted to the regulation of the Internet, which should make copyright issues clearer.

This seemed to have some people sit up in their chairs thinking critically about what that would mean. It caused an uneasiness in me as well. I want the copyright issue to be clear instead of so many shades of gray, but would a new government agency feel like Big Brother governing my Internet?

But maybe it’s not really mine.

Posted by: Amy Kelly

No Comments Posted in Tracy Mitrano
Amazingly Thoughtful Man, Good Humor Too

This was my opinion of Doug Burgum as he summarized the symposium at the closing plenary. And since he extensively used the “six-word biography” structure, I thought I would borrow it for this post. Of course, it might not be as witty as Doug’s so I guess I should put out my own disclaimer

“Less humor; contact Doug for remaining”

But Doug was putting out a lot of disclaimers too, like one about him not being a professional speaker. Simply untrue, I thought….

“If true, don’t want professionals anymore”

But the other interesting disclaimer was how intellectuals and the experts whom we trust to know better have mostly failed to see the big societal and technological changes coming. Their predictions have mostly failed or as he will put it….

“Experts use broken crystal-balls; repair now!”

So he was not about to fall into their trap and give any specific predictions. I was intrigued by his belief though that people always jumped in and made a difference when the opportunities were right. He argued that society will continue to grow and progress rapidly quoting one of the few experts who appears to have gotten one prediction right that every 18 months….

“Silicon chip power doubles, prices half”

And society has indeed progressed technologically from the days of old when a paltry 5mb storage was going for $5,000 to today when 8gb is just $8. Such rapid progress is inevitable and really all we can do is hold onto our values like those of respect, gratitude and courage because….

“Rapid Change perpetual; underlying values constant” – Doug Burgum

I was very impressed with his presentation; simple but provokingly thoughtful. He was….

“Amazing way to end amazing symposium”

Posted by: Nutifafa Yakor ‘11

No Comments Posted in Doug Burgum
Cellphones and Symposium

I am struck by the challenge students face in “turning off” their technology.  Moments after Dr. Small told us to turn off our phones, people were texting.  Later, he commented on how the audience was probably anxious to get going.  What he didn’t say was something about the need to “plug in” with the social network.  Bauerlein talked about having his students turn off their technology in class to “break the network” for a short time.  He shared examples of what students look like following class as they try to reconnect with their social lives.  Is technology our preferred mode of connection?

Whether you want it or not, technology is a part of your environment.  One of my first-year Inquiry students shared with our class that she doesn’t have a cell phone yet.  Her decision has been largely based on her desire to not “follow the herd.”  She talked about not wanting to let a cell phone take hold of her life and relationships the way it has for some of her friends.  She has come to find that NOT having a cell phone has gotten in the way of her making friends.  When she meets someone new, it has become customary to exchange cell phone numbers.  When she explains that she doesn’t have one, but can be reached at home on her land line or by e-mail, people won’t take her number.  It has actually been a friendship “deal breaker” for some people.  How entrenched are we that we have a have a one size fits all approach to relationships?

As Bauerlein suggests, we are so entrenched in technology and it is changing so rapidly, it is hard to GET PERSPECTIVE.  Younger generations are particularly susceptible to these patterns because of peer pressure.  According to Bauerlein, “peer pressure pulls you in…it creates insiders and outsiders.”  Do we need technology to be “insiders?”  How can we maintain perspective and still use technology?

I appreciate Bauerlein’s message to “preserve private space.”  Is a Symposium session part of that private, no technology space?  Small asked us to “go offline to maintain a sense of humanity.”  Where and when should we go offline?  What have we learned from Symposium about our technology habits?  How will we respond?

Posted by: Stephanie Ahlfeldt

No Comments Posted in Gary Small, Mark Bauerlein
To Regulate or Not to Regulate?

My economics professor, professor Owens, has always held that the problems of non-regulation are inevitable because innovation must necessarily precede legislation. A very interesting analysis, if you ask me. Or can anybody regulate what has not been created yet? There is nothing like “anticipatory regulation” or is there? He used it to explain last year’s financial crisis, showing how financial innovation preceded its regulation and it is this “Owen effect,” if I can call it that, that plagues the IT revolution especially in areas of intellectual property rights where the laws are either stuck in gray or almost non-existent.

In the light of this, Dr. Tracy Mitrano argues for the creation of a federal agency that oversees and attempts to limit the vast power that colossal corporations like Google and other intellectual giants have acquired in recent times. It’s really an either or situation because it is either the government controls the Internet like in the Asian and Middle Eastern countries or the corporations do. And Dr. Mitrano holds that it’s unfair to subject the time-honored American values of fairness, justice and the right to benefit from one’s work to the narrow profit objectives of corporate giants.

I think it is a fine line that we walk in this discussion. From my international perspective, I have always been fascinated by the level of freedom and the creativity it has spurred in America. Of course it has its cons as was very evident last year but this is what sustains America; in fact, this is what makes America! She cites China’s control of the Internet toward their societal values as an interesting concept regardless of whether the motives are debatable. This is where it becomes dicey. I will support legislation that helps for example to ensure people’s intellectual work are not misused but the problem is that most regulation usually don’t end there. It extends and begins to look towards ensuring what will be “appropriate” and “right” for society. I would say regulating excesses is a given. The real dilemma is how much more?

Posted by: Nutifafa Yakor ‘11

No Comments Posted in Tracy Mitrano
Times Are Changing … Fast

Burgum_6220 2Doug Burgum tells the story of Gutenburg, a man with a great idea, very little capital and no protection for his intellectual property. But he persevered because of his belief in his invention, the printing press, and the pent-up desire to reproduce the written word.

Gutenburg’s invention came along at the same and the exact same place where Martin Luther was questioning and pushing to reform certain church rules and practices, and the two converged into the Protestant Reformation.

And so today we meet together at this Lutheran college, Concordia, instead of some other kind of college. The point being, both Gutenburg and Luther were motivated by their inner drive to see their ideas become reality. Gutenburg was convinced the time had come for the printing press with changeable type, and Luther was convinced the church needed to open the windows and let in the fresh air of new ideas and interpretations of scripture.

Burgum exhalts students to be tolerant of each other; be happy in what they do; and not be too anxious about careers, because the ones they are likely to get, very probably DO NOT exist yet today, just as his career in software did not exist when he finished college. So the times are changing fast, and those who are nimble and understand the limits and well as the possibilities of technology, will be able to find their way in this climate.

Posted by: Sheldon Green

No Comments Posted in Doug Burgum
Delving deep into the Digital Divide…

So there is indeed a divide, digitally and technologically; or at least that was what me and the other panelists concluded today. But, the divide is probably not in the way you think. Discussing technology from a cultural perspective turned out to more fun that I thought it will be. I am still smiling from Rebeca’s mention of the phones in the past that were so big, you could actually use them as dumbbells! I personally know that I added some muscle using them. Samal and Alex concurred and me and Ting did all the laughing… You can join in the laughing now…

Well, the critical issues that came up centered around a redefinition of technology and the concept of the divide. Rebeca particularly argued about the existence of technology in myriad forms pertaining to agriculture, small business and industry. She effectively widened the definition to include indigenous technology and I should say that you would be amazed at how much even villagers in the developing world know about tool-making or planting and others, even without knowing Newton’s first laws of physics or Mendel’s Genetics. .Further, my position on the divide is that there is a sort of an internal or domestic divide in the developing countries which actually, is not unlike what is in the United States presently. In Ghana and Sri Lanka for example, there are highly tech savvy people writing and breaking programming codes in the cities even as they are some who are still marveled by the sight of a computer. This is the real divide but this is usually hidden when you work in averages. So some people from the developing world do have access to IT depending on availability.

But regardless, there is still some kind of technological shock for students from the developing world. Ting for example spoke of her first experience with the graphic calculator in high school and how fascinated she was and Alex added a similar story too. Of course, coming to developed countries fast approaching cashless economies and paperless universities is interesting, to say the very least; but the adjustment is not as difficult as most people think and actually differs. A Chinese from the rural China might have a harder time than someone from downtown Beijing.

In the end, I think that what lies at the heart of the divide is structural and borders on economy and socio-political stability. It borders on poverty and economic stagnation. The divide is not a phenomenon in isolation. Its just a symptom, a manifestation, of root problems.This  essentially is what really differentiates the have’s and the have-not’s of the digital world.

Posted by: Nutifafa Yakor ‘11

No Comments Posted in Concurrent Sessions, International Students