Pathways of Schizophrenia

I am a uniquely situated person. I am a biochemistry major with a sociology minor. At this point in time it puts me in both an introductory sociology class and my upper level chemistry course about the chemistry of the brain. This put me in an interesting position while discussing mental illness in sociology. The idea that mental health is dependent on how you were raised and what experiences you have is a problematic idea. Now that is not to say that how you were raised and your experiences do not shape mental illness but to say that you have your mental illness because of how you were raised is not okay. Take for example schizophrenia.
Schizophrenia is a mental disorder where individuals experience hallucinations or paranoia. These hallucinations can be seeing Image resultthings that are not there, hearing things, and smelling things that are not there. Paranoia can be  thinking that someone is trying to kill you or delusions of grandeur. One of the good examples of schizophrenia in the media is the movie “A Beautiful Mind”. The movie is about the journey of a very famous mathematician John Forbes Nash Jr. and how he experienced schizophrenia. One of the most saddening moments of the movie is when he is walking through the crowded campus yelling at his hallucinations. One of the greatest struggles with being diagnosed with schizophrenia is that patients then have to understand and accept that they way they see the world is not real.
The reality of schizophrenia is it is not very common. According to the National Institute of Mental Health only approximately 1.1% of people in the United States have the disease. However that can range from mild to very severe cases. This can be a very hard thing for patients and their families to deal with. That is one of the reasons that looking at schizophrenia as if it is caused by how a person was raised is really problematic. Not only do individuals have to deal with the disease and all that is involved but then it is also their fault that they have it in the first place.
THIS IS NOT TRUE.
Schizophrenia is caused by chemistry in the brain. In particular neuroscience suggest that it is due to imbalances in the Wnt pathway. Pathways are what we call the rout that signals take from the outside of the cell to other parts of the cell. It is similar to a game of telephone. A receptor on the outside of the cell gets a signal it then tells a signaling molecule who tells another signaling molecule and the signal is sent to where it needs to go, in this case the nucleus. In the Wnt pathway, Wnt is the receptor that starts this molecular game of telephone. Now it should be said that molecules are specifically better at telephone than most human beings so there are more options for what the end of the telephone game will be. In the one pathway signals can be sent to the nucleus where genes are expressed or it can directly effect other parts of the cell. Also molecules are good at stopping pathways after the signal is sent to there is not too much information happening at once.
One of the biggest players in the Wnt pathway is GSK. GSK helps to send the molecule beta-catenin in to the nucleus to express genes that are necessary for the cell. What is proposed in schizophrenia is that GSK does this job to well and there is too much beta-catenin entering the nucleus. The extra beta-catenin causes over expression of memory genes and may cause the formation of signals that are not really there.
Schizophrenia is still not fully known and so more research should be done to understand how this pathway can be regulated but one thing is certain. It is not an individuals fault if they have schizophrenia and the best thing we can do for them is to help them understand that and make it easier to seek out treatment.
 

Reflections on My Experience at Concordia College


Liberal arts education provides a wide-breadth of knowledge for students to deal with the ever changing and complex problems facing our world today. This is the foundation that Concordia’s educational mission statement is based upon.
The purpose of Concordia College is to influence the affairs of the world by sending into society thoughtful and informed men and women dedicated to the Christian life.
As students at Concordia, we complete a core curriculum that provides educational experience in areas outside of our primary focus. This includes language, science, religion, arts, and history.
If you happen to ask any student about what this means for them, you will most likely have the term “BREW’ing” yelled at you. This term is frequently used on campus and stands for Becoming Responsibly Engaged in the World.
It is the idea that behind learning connections between diverse areas of study and how that can be used to make positive impacts locally and globally.
Personally, at the begging of my education I did not fully grasp what BREW really means. My ‘aha-moment’ came during a religion class where I made connections between the importance of understanding the issues facing societies across the world through different perspectives. For example, how religion can act as a source of empowerment for marginalized groups that can bridge gaps in literacy, healthcare, and more.
A recent psychology course I took also brought my attention to an issue of the career path that I am currently on. This is the gender disparity that exists in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). A metaphorical leaky pipeline exists that describes the loss of women at all stages along the STEM pipeline.
I was inspired to BREW and do something about it. I participated in an outreach program that encourages young women onto the STEM pathway. The experience inspired me to continue efforts after my time at Concordia and into my own science career.
The neurochemistry course I took this semester was the culmination of my global liberal arts education. Through this class, we learned how neurometabolic pathways are impacted by environmental and biological factors associated with disease pathology. Topics included stress, obesity, neurodegenerative disorders, and more. We also had the opportunity to engaged the community regarding these issues. Communication of current science with the public is important for improving outcomes of these diseases. My group focused on raising awareness for the critical need for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) research and support.
If you have been on social media recently, you may be aware of the current fight for science regarding issues facing the scientific community. A major disconnect exists between the scientific community and public. Part of the blame falls to scientists that for too long have neglected this relationship. Members of the scientific community need to more effectively communicate to separate facts from misconceptions. This will demonstrate the importance of science with improving many aspects of society.
BREW’ing during my time at Concordia has helped me identify, and creatively help solve issues such as this. I plan on using the skills gained during my time here to do my part as a engaged citizen. As a young hopeful scientist, I have a passion for issues in regarding STEM. I now have the tools and drive to make lifelong positive impacts and I have my liberal arts education to thank for that.
Image result for science march poster

The Cracked Stone

I know Concordia is trying really, really hard to meet its “Five Goals of Liberal Learning”. Before I begin talking about these goals, it might be important to state them.

  • Instill a love for learning
  • Develop foundational skills and transferable intellectual capacities
  • Develop an understanding of disciplinary, interdisciplinary and intercultural perspectives and their connections
  • Cultivate an examined cultural, ethical, physical and spiritual self-understanding
  • Encourage responsible participation in the world


And I am not going to lie, the liberal arts education I have received here has certainly met these goals. But has my “capstone experience”?
There are a few things to recognize about the capstone experience before we examine it further. First, it is a class that graduating seniors are required to take. Second, these classes are given the “capstone” listing with the understanding that they emphasize learning in a broader sense than typical classes (i.e. not from textbooks). Indeed, the Concordia College website defines the capstone as follows:
The Capstone Course sequence of the core curriculum focuses on student achievement of the Goals for Liberal Learning, and emphasizes writing intensity and experiential learning.  These courses have students reflect on the Goals for Liberal Learning and thus reinforce the connection between liberal learning and various academic disciplines.  This part of the new curriculum was implemented in the 2010-2011 academic year.  Faculty development will be devoted to managing capstone course development in each academic division.

I worry that Concordia has backed itself into a corner with this definition. How is it that a student can gain a “love of learning” when they are forced to take a class they may not be interested in? Of course, this is the precisely the reason why a large variety of capstone courses are offered: so that a student may find one interesting enough to take. But I was not allowed that choice. The ACS chemistry major (biochemistry concentration) lists neurochemistry as a required course. When I saw that listing, in and of itself, the class was changed from a “liberal learning” course to “just another chemistry course for my major”. It loses all other qualities, simply from my recognition that it was no longer my choice.
Indeed, I love(d) chemistry, and the course was also quite enjoyable from that standpoint. But it was not a “capstone” experience (for me). I wish I could say otherwise, but I would be lying. The writing assignments still felt like assignments, and the tests still felt like tests. And honestly, I cannot complain about the class itself, as I learned much. But to insist that the class behaved in capstone sense (for me) would be fallacious.
Regarding Concordia’s “Five Goals for Liberal Learning”, I had already met them, quite likely during my second year, if memory serves. And thus, as I see it, there is no benefit to the “capstone” experience being labeled as such. If Concordia is truly the strong liberal arts institution I regard it to be, the existence of such an experience is moot. Might I offer a solution that can make both the students and the administration happy?

Students are here to learn, but they do not want to learn everything that is asked of them. Yes, this is hypocritical, but for all intents and purposes this is the truth. Ask any student if they enjoy their homework, and the response will be “no”. And so clearly it follows from this that to “instill a love of learning”, Concordia must ensure that students can pursue their own paths of learning in a subject, however niche or specific that subject may be. And what could the students gain because of this (instead of a grade on a transcript like the capstone course gives)? The students could create whatever they feel fit to create. We already have a Celebration of Student Scholarship each spring. Could it not just be an extra requirement to make seniors showcase their projects then?
What I am proposing, in its most simple sense, is this:

  • Set up a 1-or-0 credit class that is called the “capstone”.
  • Let a student pick a faculty member to work an independent study (one-on-one) with. They can meet once per week.
  • The student must produce something tangible (g. a book, published journal article, work of visual art, composed music, theatre event) to be showcased at the end of the year
  • The faculty member gives the student an appropriate grade based on perceived work ethic. (This could even just work as a pass/fail.)

The reason this should work well, is that by senior year, most students have figured out where their passions lie, and if they have not, a single “capstone” class isn’t going to be a “massive epiphany” to them, but conversations with a respected professor might. Even further, this allows each student to leave the institution with something that they can look back at and marvel, saying “I did that”. Administrators would be happy too, seeing a drastic increase in student research and publication (i.e. something they can brag about when trying to convince prospective students to attend).

Did my neurochemistry course mimic anything remotely like this? Sadly, no. Simply put, I learned about neurochemistry. What a “life-changing”, “mind-bending” experience that “prepared me to conquer the problems of the real world” and “instilled a love of learning” in me. Indeed, I almost felt as though sometimes it did the opposite. This semester I had a mathematical breakthrough that will likely change the course of modern mathematical research, and instead of being able to devote my time where it was most efficient, I was writing blogs about neurochemistry that would never be read by more than a handful of people.
Perhaps I have become a cynic, but perhaps there is something inherently flawed about the capstone experience. I am not arguing against neurochemistry as a class, but rather the “capstone” subdiscipline with which it was assigned. I know this blog was supposed to explain how this class met the goals, but my morals got the best of me and I had to tell the truth. And please, don’t take my opinion as the tried-and-true fact; it is likely I could be the exception rather than the rule. If the opinion of the majority is in support of the capstone, then it is likely the best option.
With that said, I believe there is going to be a change in the capstone experience very soon. It is being replaced by PEAK (I don’t know if it is meant to be all capitalized, as I have only heard of it by word-of-mouth). And with any luck, this will let future students avoid some of the cynicism that I have felt my final semester of college.
(Don’t worry about me though, I am truly quite content with life right now. This was just my opinion regarding a very small matter, that in the end will not make much of a difference.)

Autism Is More Than Genes

Diseases like type 1 diabetes and sickle-cell anemia happen through a defect in a single gene.  Sometimes all it takes is one wrong letter in the genetic code to create a life-threatening disease.  If only autism were so easy to understand and treat.  
Unlike diabetes, autism cannot be explained simply by proteins or genes.  Diabetes has several obvious symptoms (frequent urination, excessive thirst, and exhaustion), it has one absent protein, and it has one mutated gene.  Autism is in another world of complexity on several levels.
First of all, autism itself is a slippery disease to diagnose.  Different people have different classic symptoms at different severities.  Sometimes autism is mistaken for ADHD or language difficulties, and vice versa.  There is no biological test for autism like there is for diabetes.  
Second, in autism, there is no single gene that explains the symptoms.  When we sequence the genomes of patients with a disease, sometimes we find one gene that is defective in all patients.  Diabetes is a great example of this.  We knew for decades that diabetics were incapable of making insulin, but only genetic sequencing could show that the cause was actually quite simple: the instructions for the insulin protein were mutated.  Only about fifteen percent of autism cases across the spectrum can be pointed directly to genes.  Multiple genes are involved, and some combinations of mutations seem to be worse than others.  These relationships are too complex for even the smartest scientists to understand.  
Twins can tell us a lot about the importance of genes in a disease.  When one twin has autism, what are chances their identical twin also has autism?  There is a 77% chance for males and 50% for females.  Why don’t these other twins all have autism as well?  Something must explain the difference.  
The missing factor in autism is the environment.  A similar relationship happens in cancer.  Cancer runs in families, so part of a person’s risk for cancer comes from harmful genes.  The other part of the risk comes from lifestyle.  A person with resilient genes may avoid cancer by living cleanly, but could still get lung cancer if they smoke three pack a day.  Likewise, someone with cancer genes can breathe only air their entire life and still develop cancer. 
Viral infection is one non-genetic thing that can add to autism risk.  A viral infection at a critical point in development before birth can alter the immune system of both mother and child, and eventually alter the fetus’s brain.  Vaccines are probably a vital part of autism prevention.  
A mother’s mental stress can explain some cases of autism.  This is true before birth and during birth.  For example, autism tends to increase after large groups of pregnant women experience disastrous events such as violent storms.  The trauma causes the release of stress hormones, which activate the mother’s immune system and can harm the baby’s developing brain.  Stress during birth can increase complications like low oxygen supply to the baby, which is of course harmful to the brain.  The old wive’s tale that traumatizing a pregnant woman will harm the baby probably has a grain of truth.  
Not only is autism a disorder of multiple genes, but lifestyle and environment of the mother are involved, too.  Many connected factors come together to produce many complicated effects.  It may turn out that the thing most affected in autism is the way our neurons are connected and knit together to send signals across the brain.  One molecule injected in someone’s veins probably can’t fix that.  However, by the time we understand autism enough to cure it, we will probably have understood it enough to lessen the burden we put on the autistic and maybe even appreciate what only they can add to our lives.

Capping the Stone – The Culmination of My Concordia Experience

If any one of you decides to attend Concordia be prepared to hear a lot about BREWing. However, unfortunately this BREWing is not of the alcoholic variety (generally). So if you were getting excited there for a second I apologize. So for the few that are still reading this article and want to know more about Concordia’s academic goals, BREW is an acronym for Becoming Responsibly Engaged in the World. And I can understand if this definition sounds like nothing more than pretentious academia gobbely-goop that people use as ammo against liberal arts colleges. However, the concept of BREW has intentionally bled into every one of my classes at Concordia from the driest of math lessons (no offense math) to the lofty existential discussions in religion that have made me question my entire purpose.
The concept of BREW was at its most importance in my Neurochemistry capstone course as the function of a capstone course is to take all that you’ve learned with you liberal arts education and put it together to create something meaningful (a.k.a. BREWing). And I will say with utmost sincerity I truly felt that happened in Neurochemistry. We covered a variety of difficult topics like obesity, Alzheimer’s, ALS, mental illness, and addiction in a very nuanced way. Of course the primary aspect of these diseases that we covered were related to neuroscience. However, the most important thing that was stressed in this course was that science doesn’t exist in a vacuum. In real life scientists don’t just sit in dark rooms spouting off random scientific jargon at each other and either agreeing or disagreeing with each others’ findings.
What makes science important and special is when findings can be conveyed accurately to the public as well as being able to make a real world impact. Furthermore, science is directly affected by larger forces such as society, culture, economics, business, and politics. And these topics were brought up many times. Questions like how can we relate to people that vaccines don’t cause autism or is there even a scientific way to treat the obesity epidemic were brought up. I know that as a freshmen going into college I wouldn’t have been able to even think up these sort of question let alone look at them in a multifaceted way. How we can impact and respond to a world where it seems like everything is becoming more and more complicated is important. What’s even more important is being engaged in this crazy world in a responsible and informed manner – especially since there seems to be an even bigger blurring of information despite so much of it being readily available. And now on the cusp of graduation, I feel like I’ve reached a point where I can.

Alzheimer’s – What Makes Memories

Alzheimer’s is all around us. It’s pretty hard to ignore considering it not only is the the most common form of dementia but it also affects over 3 million Americans each year – mostly folks over the age 65. However, one of the biggest misconceptions about the disease is that it is normal aging when it is in fact, it is progressive neurological disease. Despite a net loss of neurons occurring, most Alzheimer’s patients do not die directly due to the disease but often of other pathogens like pneumonia. But as many can attest the effects on the quality of life is devastating. And despite many years of research and clinical observations we are still no where close to curing it.
So this leads to the question – what is going on exactly? Like most neurological diseases the exact cause of Alzheimer’s is unknown. But an interesting hallmark of Alzheimer’s is the presence of neurofibrilary tangles. What these essentially are tangles of the misfolded protein tau that clump together within various brain regions. Research has found that these tangles can occur in the entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, and cerebral cortex. These brain regions are specifically associated with spatial memory, emotion, and higher cognitive thinking. So its pretty easy to figure out how the symptomatology comes about.
Another thing of note is that working memory generally decreases with age due to changes in cellular firing and signaling. But one study did find that with rhesus monkeys they could reverse the negative effects on working memory with cyclic AMP, an important messenger in cellular signaling processes.
Sources:
1) http://www.alz.org/alzheimers_disease_what_is_alzheimers.asp
2) https://www.nia.nih.gov/alzheimers/publication/2011-2012-alzheimers-disease-progress-report/understanding-biology-alzheimers

5 Things Your High School Gym Teacher Didn’t Tell You About Concussions


 
Like many other students at Concordia College, I am (was) a student athlete. I wrestled for three years at Concordia, and I wrestled all the way from high school back to kindergarten. Only my senior year did I decide that enough was enough and it was time to hang up the wrestling shoes. And yet I feel guilty despite all the time and energy I spent cultivating my skills. My reasoning for quitting was that it was time to give my brain a break.
 
Nearly a year ago today I was wrestling with a teammate. It was the off season, so we were just messing around. My partner took a low shot, which I blocked with my knee. We had gone through this motion probably a thousand times before, but this time the knee cap to his temple knocked him out. He was fine, but he was unconscious for a few moments.
Instances like my wrestling practice are all too common in American colleges and high schools. Our obsession with sports is often chalked up to their ability to help young people develop character traits like tenacity and team working cohesiveness. But what’s the catch?
 
Our Concordia College neurochemistry class reviewed whats happening to our brain cells following a concussion, and there’s five things happening on a molecular level that you should know about.

  1. Ionic Flux-  After that big hit, your brain cells are reeling, and the ions (sodium, potassium, and calcium) are flying all over the place. Lots of positive ions move out of the cells, and they can’t signal anymore. This doesn’t allow the brain to communicate effectively.
  2. Energy crisis- Dealing with an injury takes a lot of energy. When the ions start moving around, your brain cells try to move them back against their gradient. This takes up a ton of energy, and the brain cells end up exhausting their energy stores rather quickly. In turn, your brain cells are subjected to metabolic stress, which is not a good thing.
  3. Cytoskeletal damage- If your brain cells were a building, and you threw those buildings against a wall really really hard, you’d expect there to be some damage right? This also happens to your brain cells during a concussion. The mechanical support system that holds your cells together (called the cytoskeleton) can break apart from the force of the hit.
  4. Axonal damage- Axons relay signals between brain cells, and they look like a long bridge projecting from the cells. Unfortunately these long bridges are also prone to breaking just like the cytoskeleton. Cells with broken axons tend to shrink and/or die.
  5. Protease dysfunction- Proteases are the small molecules that recycle proteins. To do this however, the protease needs energy. Remember the energy crisis that’s going on in your brain? Well if we don’t have the energy to keep your cells alive, we probably won’t be breaking down any proteins. This results in the accumulation of proteins within cells. This isn’t a big deal in younger brains normally, but as we age this can cause problems.


Even with all this evidence that hitting each other with our heads is bad for us (duh) we continue to engage in sports that consistently cause concussions. After thinking about this, I think I would still wrestle even if I knew it I would get a concussion. I believe that it’s easy for people to glaze over the life lessons we can take away from sports, but I definitely would not be going to medical school without having wrestled first. Wrestling taught me to stay on task and keep grinding even when things aren’t going well. I likely would have given up on my dream of being a physician without sports, so the brain trauma was worth it for me. But I think it is important to educate younger people about the risks involved in contact sports, so they can decide for themselves.

Having Trouble Remembering Simple Every Day Tasks? Read This!

I forgot that my research group was meeting in our classroom instead of the professors office? Does that mean I have Alzheimer’s disease?
To answer my own question, no that does not mean that I have Alzheimer’s. One of the common misconceptions by the general population (myself initially included in this group) is that anyone having memory problems, particularly older individuals, has Alzheimer’s. In actuality, Alzheimer’s is a sub category of a neurodegenerative disease called dementia. Although Alzheimer’s makes up the majority of dementia cases (roughly 50-60%) it has specific criteria that separates it from other forms of dementia.
 
Alzheimer’s is usually noticed by people’s family members and friends first. However, it can be tricky to spot because some of the early symptoms are easily brushed off, such as forgetting newly learned information and confusion. It seems like this happens to most of us on a regular basis, but with Alzheimer’s  people continually are in states of confusion and have difficulty performing every day tasks. More advanced Alzheimer’s is easily identified.
I was at a rotary club meeting for lunch while I was shadowing a physician, and the local Alzheimer’s chapter was giving a talk on when you should see a doctor about dementia. The example was that the speaker’s grandmother made chocolate chip cookies every week her whole life. As she was getting older, the grandmother had trouble remember the recipe that she normally would never have to look up. It is instances like these where you should see a physician soon.
 
What’s happening to my brain if I have Alzheimer’s?
The Alzheimer’s Association does a fantastic job of helping people visualize what’s happening on a cellular level with Alzheimer’s ( Here’s a link to their website http://www.alz.org/alzheimers_disease_what_is_alzheimers.asp )
Image result for alzheimers What physicians and scientists are seeing on a molecular level is that the brain’s cells (fancy people call them neurons) are dying from an aggregation of proteins. These proteins form a plaque, and they prevent the neurons from functioning normally. Wondering how and why these plaques are forming? I was too! So my neurochemistry class decided to read a paper on what might be going wrong in Alzheimer’s.
 
Two main points can be taken away from our group’s discussion on Alzheimer’s.

  1. There is an involvement with the PI3k/Akt pathway
  2. Insulin resistance is occurring

PI3K/Akt pathway
The findings from our paper rather surprised me. From the other neurodegenerative disease we’ve read about, usually the PI3K/Akt pathway is suppressed. This makes sense to me, because this pathway is involved in cell proliferation and survival. I.e this pathway keeps brain cells alive. In Alzheimer’s however, this pathway is overactive, which results in several negative effects, and it could be contributing to the overall demise of brain cells.
 
Insulin Resistance
I was rather skeptical about the involvement of insulin in Alzheimer’s until I spoke with one of my peers. As he described what is occurring to me it made sense. Some scientists who are researching Alzheimer’s are actually describing it as Type 3 diabetes. Click on this link if you’d like to read their review article https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2769828/
Once the PI3K/Akt pathway is initiated, the downstream signaling proteins block the insulin receptor by internalizing it into the cell, and the cells become resistance to insulin. This occurs in type two diabetes in the pancreas and fat tissue, and it’s happening in the brain tissue of people with Alzheimer’s. Thus supporting the assertion that Alzheimer’s may be another form of diabetes, it’s simply happening in the brain instead of the pancreas this time. Mind=Blown.

Dopamine’s Other SECRET Job

You’ve likely heard about the neurotransmitter called dopamine. The first time I heard about it was in 7th grade health class when we were talking about illegal drug effects on the brain. I was surprised to learn that both stimulants (things like meth) and depressants (stuff like heroin) both cause a rush of dopamine in your brain. This creates the feeling of intense pleasure and even euphoria. However, dopamine also has a job you probably haven’t heard of…

 
To understand dopamine’s other job, we have to talk about what it actually does to your brain cells. Dopamine can be both excitatory and inhibitory. That is to say that it can make it easier for brain cells to signal other cells, or it can make it harder. There are two main receptors for dopamine (Receptors are small proteins usually on the surface of a cell that capture signaling molecules and relay their specific signal). The first is D1, which is an excitatory receptor. The other is D2, which is an inhibitory receptor.

The part of the brain that is shaded in red is one of the main hubs of dopamine in the brain. It’s called the substantia nigra because in a healthy brain the brain cells are actually black in color! This part of the brain plays a huge roll in regulating both desired and undesired movements. Brain cells from the substantia nigra have long projections that travel to the switchboard of the brain called the Thalamus, and to the reward center of the brain called the Striatum. These brain cells release dopamine, which bind to the D1 and D2 receptors I previously wrote about.
Desired Movement:
For desired movement, the substantia nigra releases dopamine into the striatum, which in turn does not signal the thalamus. This allows for an overall excitatory effect, which makes sense because rewarding the movement we just performed will make it happen again, thus creating desired movement.
 
Undesired Movement
Undesired movements, such as shakes and tremors, are inhibited by the substantia nigra. It does this by releasing a different neurotransmitter called GABA, which has an inhibitory effect. By inhibiting certain movements, we end up with an overall smooth stabilized movement. This is vital for simple tasks like picking up a class of water, or bringing a spoon to your mouth.
 
 
Parkinson’s: When the Substantia Nigra has a problem
A neurodegenerative disorder you’ve likely heard of is Parkinson’s disease. Simply put, Parkinson’s is the death of the substantia nigra. With the death of the substantia nigra, motor problems arise. There is no inhibitory effect on the thalamus, and tremors result. Additionally, dizziness, trouble sleeping, speech trouble, and loss of smell may also be present. On a cellular level, a type of plaque called Lewy bodies (composed of a protein called alpha synuclein) accumulates around the dead cells. Treatment for Parkinson’s involves replacing the lost dopamine with a precursor of the neurotransmitter called L-DOPA.
 
Current Research:
The paper we discussed for Parkinson’s highlighted the importance of a subset of signaling proteins called kinases. Kinases are activator molecules that relay tons of different signals in the cell. Scientists are beginning to investigate the role between kinases and the accumulation of the Lewy bodies. The kinases perform many different functions within the cells, but they mainly involve recycling mitochondria, oxidative stress, and inflammation. These kinases offer a chance to combat Parkinson’s and may be a stepping stone to curing this neurodegenerative disorder.
 
 

Four Things About Autism You’ve Probably Never Hear…


One word that parents always dread hearing is coming up more and more in elementary schools. Autism. For some it’s a debilitating disorder that impairs basic function. For others, it can be a minor hinderance, but one that can be coped with. Regardless of the severity, autism can offer several challenges for individuals who have been inflicted by the disease. With the rising amount of diagnosed cases of autism comes increased research on the disorder. In our Concordia College neurochemistry class, we discussed a paper on the environmental effects of autism, and I’m here to dispel several myths (and add a few truths) about what we currently know about autism.
 

  1. There is no (zip, nada, zilch,) correlation between vaccines and autism, but there is a correlation with maternal viral infections.

That’s right. Vaccinating your children won’t give them autism, but some data has indicated that if the mother’s immune system could be playing a role in autism. The mother’s antibodies may be interfering with the development of the baby’s nervous system. 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776649/ ▲
2. Autism is not a disease that’s all or nothing, instead it’s a spectrum.
One thing that I’ve found rather interesting with the diagnosis of autism being redefined is that it’s a spectrum now. Now, some diseases that were once their own separate illnesses have been put under the umbrella of autism. In middle school I knew an individual who had some classical symptoms of Asperger’s syndrome and as such he was diagnosed with said syndrome. In high school, the idea of autism being a spectrum disorder received traction, and he explained to me and the rest of our class that his diagnosis had technically changed even though his symptoms had remained consistent.
 
3. Autism could all be caused by a zinc deficiency
Wait what?? A zinc deficiency? That’s it? Those were my thoughts as well. Interestingly, zinc is needed for proper neurological function as well as stabilization of some protein domains and proper immune function. It’s also a trace element, meaning we don’t need a whole lot of it. Women who become pregnant often do not know until many weeks after conception, and then begin taking their prenatal vitamins. Although zinc is unlikely to be the only culprit, it could be playing a significant role in autism’s development.
 
4. It’s a developmental disorder
One of the concepts that our neurochemistry class grappled with after reading the literature on autism is the actual onset of the disease. It still remains unclear, and there is added difficulty to understanding this problem since autism has a wide array of manifestations. One possibility is that the damage from autism has already occurred when the baby is born. This is one of the hardest things for people to wrap their head around, especially since we don’t typically see symptoms until the baby is a couple of years old already. https://www.autismspeaks.org
 
Although much remains unclear about autism, one thing is for certain. Scientist, psychologists, and parents are all hard at work trying to understand this disease and how we can deal most effectively with it. Moving forward, it is likely that more research on neural development under stressful conditions will be needed to fully comprehend this disorder.
 

Spam prevention powered by Akismet