Addiction: Where to Place the Blame???

The debate about whether addiction is a disease or an active choice made by the individual has been around for centuries and has largely been an opinion based argument. However, in the past several decades, extensive research has been done to better understand the addiction. The research shows that the sustained use of drugs can alter synapse and lead to chemical imbalances of various neurotransmitters. Research has also shown that addiction shares several physiological pathways with other degenerative disease. This mounting evidence can be used, and rightly should be used to show that addiction is not a choice but rather a complex neurological disease. Classifying addiction as a disease will allow people struggling with the disorder to seek help without fear of ridicule.

Many drugs affect individuals in similar ways, the difference occurs in how symptoms. Drugs such as cocaine and amphetamines increase levels of dopamine within the neuron. This excess dopamine, which is the main neurotransmitter associated with pleasure binds with D1 receptors in the neuron which increase cAMP. The increase of cAMP  increases the activation of PKA and transcription factors such as CREB and delta FOS-B. These transcription factors, then transcribe specific segments of DNA which produces a multitude of proteins. The over activation of these proteins leads to changes in synapse and thus affects neural connections within the brain.

Ok so enough of the nerd talk. Addiction promotes a feel good response in the brain. The chemical that is responsible for this feeling has the ability to change how the brain is “wired” leading to dependence on the drug.  More simply put taking drugs change connections in the brain hard wiring users to take and crave the drug.

With the realization that those people addicted to drugs are no longer in control, where does a person put the blame. If an individual is hardwired for a drug, can they really be held responsible for doing things in order to obtain that drug? I’m not attempting to sway individuals one way or another, and honestly, I do not know when blame can be can be shifted from the user to the disease of addiction. Perhaps this depends in some part on the potency of the drug. Different drugs have different potentials thus allowing individuals to become addicted at different rates. Even the issue of initially taking the drug can become very convoluted upon further contemplation. Examining the various social and socioeconomic factors of drug addicts provides several similarities such as poverty, lack of education, violence, and potential even culture. These factors could be used to make the argument that individuals in these circumstances do not have a choice in the initial decision to take the drugs.

The issue of drug abuse and addiction is complicated from a variety of standpoints. The evidence that addiction is in fact a disease is strong. The mechanisms and pathways that various drugs affect synapse connections and neruochemical balances varies, however the feel good chemical dopamine seems to play a major role. The social factors surrounding addiction must also be considered when attempting to assign blame. Can blame be placed on a person who is designed for the drug? How prevalent are the social circumstances of the drug addict? Where does the blame go??

Sources

https://moodle.cord.edu/pluginfile.php/818256/mod_resource/content/0/Overview%20of%20addiction%202019.pdf

 

Finding a Treatment for Schizophrenia: Why So Complicated?

Mental illness is an ongoing problem in our world. In America alone, one in five adults experience a mental health issue. One in 25 Americans have a serious mental illness such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder. Even children can experience mental health problems. Several mental health disorders, including schizophrenia, show signs of development before a person turns 14, and 75% of disorders begin before age 24. That being said, less than 20% of children/adolescents with mental health problems receive treatment. Some mental health disorders are easily treatable with either therapy, medication, or both. Some of the more serious mental disorders, such as schizophrenia, are not so easily treatable. One reason why is because there has not been a ton of research regarding treatments.

 

What is schizophrenia?

Schizophrenia is a mental health disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally. Symptoms of schizophrenia include a range of problems in cognition, behavior, and emotion. Some symptoms include delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thinking, disorganized or abnormal motor behavior, and negative symptoms such as lack of emotion, loss of interest in everyday activities, or being socially withdrawn. Schizophrenia symptoms usually show up during adolescence. In men, it typically starts around early 20s, while in women it starts in the late 20s. People with schizophrenia require lifelong treatment. Early treatment is best but isn’t always the easiest.

Why is it so hard to treat?

Schizophrenia is a complicated illness to treat because we do not know the cause of it. Researchers have ideas that it is a combination of genetics, brain chemistry, and environmental factors, but are still unsure as to what causes the disorder to develop. Some believe neurotransmitters such as dopamine and glutamate may contribute to schizophrenia. Others believe it has to do with specific signaling pathways in the brain. These pathways include the Wnt signaling pathway, an important pathway in organism development Research has shown that problems with this pathway can lead to cognitive deficits in animal models, implying that it is involved in cognitive development. Problems in development may contribute to abnormalities resulting in mental disorders such as schizophrenia.

 

 

 

  • https://magellanhealthinsights.com/2018/05/23/7-mental-health-myths-and-facts/#targetText=Fact%3A%20Mental%20health%20problems%20are,bipolar%20disorder%2C%20or%20major%20depression
  • https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/schizophrenia/symptoms-causes/syc-20354443
  • https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/schizophrenia/schizophrenia-treatment-challenges
  • https://moodle.cord.edu/pluginfile.php/798923/mod_resource/content/2/2013%20wnt%20GSK%20and%20schizophrenia.pdf
  • Images
    • <p style=”font-size: 0.9rem;font-style: italic;”><a href=”https://www.flickr.com/photos/141608731@N06/38843081961″>”schizophrenia”</a><span>by <a href=”https://www.flickr.com/photos/141608731@N06″>johnbill552</a></span> is licensed under <a href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/?ref=ccsearch&atype=html” style=”margin-right: 5px;”>CC BY 2.0</a><a href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/?ref=ccsearch&atype=html” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer” style=”display: inline-block;white-space: none;opacity: .7;margin-top: 2px;margin-left: 3px;height: 22px !important;”><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc_icon.svg” /><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc-by_icon.svg” /></a></p>
    • <p style=”font-size: 0.9rem;font-style: italic;”><a href=”https://www.behance.net/gallery/81938079/Schizophrenia”>”Schizophrenia”</a><span> by <span>Ahmed Emad Eldin</span></span> is licensed under <a href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/?ref=ccsearch&atype=html” style=”margin-right: 5px;”>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</a><a href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/?ref=ccsearch&atype=html” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer” style=”display: inline-block;white-space: none;opacity: .7;margin-top: 2px;margin-left: 3px;height: 22px !important;”><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc_icon.svg” /><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc-by_icon.svg” /><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc-nc_icon.svg” /><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc-nd_icon.svg” /></a></p>

The Unlikely Duo: Alzheimer’s Disease and Type II Diabetes

Most people’s first thoughts are that there is no connection between Alzheimer’s disease and type II diabetes. Years ago that may have been true, but research today proves otherwise. In fact, people with type II diabetes are more likely to develop Alzheimer’s, and vice versa. More than 30 million people in the United States have diabetes – about 1 in 10 people. Between 90% and 95% of people with diabetes have type II diabetes. About 5.8 million people, of all ages, in the United States have Alzheimer’s. Roughly 1 in 10 people over the age of 65 has this disease. Alzheimer’s disease is the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States.

What is Alzheimer’s Disease?

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a type of dementia that effects memory, thinking, and behavior. AD usually occurs in old age, most people being over 65, but it can occur in younger people (early-onset Alzheimer’s). It is a progressive disease where symptoms become worse over time. This disease is only diagnosable post-mortem (after death).

               What is going on in the brain?

Though it is unknown exactly how AD starts, scientists do know two major abnormal structures that play a role in the pathology of the disease. The first are the presence of beta-amyloid plaques. These plaques are build-ups of the protein fragment, beta-amyloid. The second indicator is the presence of neurofibrillary tangles. These tangles are twisted fibers of the tau protein.

What is Type II Diabetes?

Type II diabetes (T2D) occurs when cells in the body, including in the brain, do not respond normally to insulin. Insulin is a hormone secreted by the pancreas to help regulate glucose (blood sugar) levels. Cells need glucose for energy. Normally, cells willingly take up glucose with the help of insulin. In T2D, cells don’t respond to the insulin, therefore not taking up glucose. This is called insulin resistance. Since glucose doesn’t enter the cells, the pancreas secretes more and more insulin until it eventually can’t keep up. Why T2D occurs is unknown but there are some risk factors including being overweight, fat distribution, inactivity, age, etc.

How are they connected?

Brains Chained by Addiction

The Pandemic of Addiction

The statistics surrounding addiction don’t lie, the U.S. has a pandemic on its hands. So what’s the situation?

In 2017, we saw a 9.6% increase in overdose deaths in the U.S. from 2016. That is a near ten percent jump in just one year. This isn’t a new issue. Also according to the CDC,  “During 2008–2011, an average of 1.1 million emergency department (ED) visits were made each year for drug poisoning, with a visit rate of 35.4 per 10,000 persons. Poisoning is the leading cause of injury-related mortality in the United States, with more than 40,000 deaths annually. Drugs account for 90% of poisoning deaths, and the number of deaths from drug poisoning has increased substantially in recent years.

If you’re interested in digging deeper, here’s the link to the CDC’s website, where the above statistics were taken from. If a quick video interview is more your style, check on the short video below.

Continue reading →

Is addiction a choice?

 

Addiction is a complex problem with many people disagreeing on what it is, how to treat it, and how addicts should be treated or not treated. One of the most hot button topics is whether addiction is a choice or not and by default, the fault of the person addicted. Let’s discuss the two sides and then look at what the science tells us.

 

Those who argue that addiction is a choice say that the individual made the first choice to ingest the drug and the consequences fall on their shoulders for what follows. Some may even say that those who are “psychologically weak” are the ones who get addicted and those who may be “psychologically stronger” could quit the drug whenever they wanted.

On the other hand, those who think addiction is not a choice may contend that while yes, the individual made the choice to ingest the drug, there may be other circumstances that led to that decision. Perhaps they were dealing with mental health issues and felt the need to self-medicate or were pressured by their friends. Additionally, people on this side of the issue often point to the horrible effects of chronic drug use and the torture of withdrawal to argue that no one would consciously choose that for themselves.

What’s the science behind it?

Now that we know some the aspects of public perception, let’s look at what the science supports.

 

Within our brain, there is something called the reward pathway. When this pathway is activated, it generates pleasurable emotions and also activates motivation systems that increase desire for that pleasurable feeling. Drugs like meth, cocaine, and opioids, stimulate parts of this pathway like the ventral tegmental area and the nucleus accumbens with an excess amount of dopamine compared to our everyday stimuli. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that controls our reaction and feelings of pleasure. When people don’t take the drug, their body begins to crave that pleasurable feeling given by the drug since the body has become accustomed to the higher levels of dopamine produced by the drug.

Let’s use meth as an example to see how this pathway works. Meth can inter a neuron and replace dopamine causing it to be pushed out into the cell. Similarly, the drug can also block the re-uptake of excess dopamine back into the neuron. Both of these interactions increase the amount of dopamine in the synapse leading to that pleasurable feeling.

However, this pleasurable feeling given by the excess of dopamine creates a craving for more in the brain when meth is not being used. The everyday levels of dopamine given off are no longer enough because the synapse has changed to accommodate the increase of dopamine. Not only is our body craving dopamine, but other downstream factors have been altered.  When there is an excess of firing from dopamine receptors, there is increased phosphorylation of CAMP which then leads to the expression of immediate early genes (IEG) like c-fos. These IEG’s start a cascade of other events that may form addictive behavior as well as molecular changes that lead to synaptic plasticity and long term potentiation. Essentially, after becoming addicted to drugs, the systems in your brain physically change making it harder and harder for you to quit.

So is it a choice or not?

Therefore, the actual process of becoming addicted to a drug is not a choice. Individuals may disagree on the importance of personal responsibility of first ingesting the drug but there is no scientific disagreement on the strength of the biological processes that addiction creates. Your brain has been physically altered, there is no “psychologically strong” or “psychologically weak” because all our brains can become victim to this process. If you are interested in learning more about addiction and it’s effects, visit https://www.samhsa.gov/public-messages

Party in the Cleft

Evolutionarily, humans have been wired to perceive feelings of pleasure based on certain stimuli that are associated with survival of the individual or species. Stimuli that evoke this reward system include sexual pleasure, foods, drinks, and success to list a few. Stimuli activate the mesolimbic dopamine pathway which originates in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). When VTA neurons are activated, dopamine release is increased at the synaptic cleft of the nucleus accumbens (NA). Both the NA and the VTA are associated with motivation due to the long-term potentiation that occurs. Under natural stimuli, dopamine is invited to the cleft tea time party and leaves after a short while. However, humans have found and developed different more intense ways to satisfy the reward system that aren’t natural “survival stimuli.” The use of drugs.

Drugs activate the same reward pathway which is a large proponent of their addictive nature. Mainly, drugs act to increase dopamine and other neurotransmitters in the synaptic cleft of the NA to induce the feelings of pleasure. Dopamine causes D1 receptors to fire action potentials which then begins a signal cascade in the neurons. If neurons are fired regularly, AMPA receptors increase in number and become more active which leads to long term potentiation and memory formation. Continual use also changes the size and shape of neurons. Once neurons change, they are unlikely to return to the original form.

NIDA-NIH

Increasing dopamine and other neurotransmitters in the cleft can be achieved in many ways and therefore is variable for different drugs. Below are a few commonly used drugs and how they increase dopamine in the cleft.

  • Cocaine inhibits the re-uptake of dopamine, allowing the dopamine to act for a longer period of time at higher concentrations.
  • Opioids inhibit GABA which inhibits dopamine, therefore increasing dopamine activity.

Cocaine and opioids are addictive because of the increased D1 activation that induces a signal cascade resulting in synaptic plasticity, memory formation in the motivation centers.

In the recruitment of dopamine and norepinephrine to the cleft party, cocaine and opioids are sorely incompetent compared to methamphetamine. Cocaine and opioids throw an intimate slumber party with only their closest friends while methamphetamine invites the whole college campus and advertises free root beer at a weekend long music festival.

  • Methamphetamine induces the release of dopamine in four different ways, induces the release of norepinephrine in two ways, blocks re-uptake of the neurotransmitters, and blocks their degradation.

For this reason, methamphetamine is highly addictive and difficult to quit. Even small amounts of methamphetamine cause massive recruitment of neurotransmitters. The neurotransmitters induce the same signaling pathway through D1 receptors and leads to the expression of genes that are associated with addictive behaviors. Some of these genes encode proteins that are further involved in long term potentiation and learning, such as in the case for delta FosB. These processes cause damage to the synapse that can never fully be repaired.

Therefore, methamphetamine addiction should be avoided at all costs or treated early on. Even early treatment may not be enough to reverse the damage that has been done. Though these drugs provide incredible rewards for an individual, their temporary effects are not worth the lifelong consequences.

Schizophrenia: Reality vs Stigma

Schizophrenia: What is it and how do we treat it?

Schizophrenia is one of the most challenging mental illnesses to manage and function with. Symptoms often interfere with reality, having a significant impact on relationships and a person’s ability to function within the “normal” expectations of society. First, for a quick one-minute overview, check out this video from the National Alliance on Mental Health.

Medications, which are typically antipsychotics, are far from perfect, or even decent; the side effects are horrendous and can be permanent, many medications don’t work well or only treat certain symptoms, and constant dose adjustments must be made to maximize efficiency while limiting negative effects. Due to these problems, many patients with schizophrenia refuse to stay on their medications, raising difficult questions for family members and physicians. Check out this website from the Mayo Clinic for some basic information about schizophrenia and its treatments.

Continue reading →

Sugar on the Brain: Alzheimer’s Disease

What’s the story?

Over the past decade, sugar has become an increasingly hot topic as a part of our diets. Updated recommendations have been in the news as recent as two days ago, which you can check out here.

Various cities and states have  implemented (or tried to implement) sugary drink taxes to try and curb their populations’ never ending enthusiasm for these addictive sugar-laden foods. Many of the consequences of very high sugar intake are well known, like weight gain and type II diabetes. However, what a lot of people don’t know is how tightly linked diabetes and the development of Alzheimer’s are.

 

However, what a lot of people don’t know is how tightly linked diabetes and the development of Alzheimer’s are.

 

According to Mayo Clinic, a variety of studies have linked Alzheimer’s disease with diabetes, especially type two diabetes. While some studies are inconclusive and the mechanisms are poorly understood, there is certainly some connection between insulin signaling in the brain and the development of Alzheimer’s disease. In fact, many people with diabetes have changes in the brain that are indicative of both Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. This may also contribute to the symptoms being seen, separate from an Alzheimer’s diagnosis. If you want to read more, here’s the article.

Continue reading →

Stressful Memory Formation: Nature, Nurture, Notion

What really goes on in your brain when you experience a stressful event? And the memories that are formed, what makes them shift from a helpful reminder of a trepidatious situation to a triggering event? These are questions that neuroscientists are asking about memories formed after stressful events. While it seems obvious that stress is a part of human life and remembering past events contributes to learning and success in our futures, there are some stressful events that create memories upon whose recall manifests as anxiety or PTSD symptoms. Are these memories a coping mechanism for dealing with extreme stress and trauma, or do they exacerbate the trauma such that it adversely affects someone’s life experience long after the fact?

 

The molecular pathway outlined in Reul’s article involves a stress hormone stimulus that causes a protein to be modified in such a way that it allows two genes to be transcribed. These genes code for proteins that are important for the growth of neurons and memory consolidation. In a stressful situation, these genes are transcribed in higher amounts, allowing for a stressful event to be recorded and remembered in the brain. If a more anxious person experiences a stressful event, more proteins are synthesized, and the memory consolidation is stronger.

 

Here are three proposed molecular differences in brains that experience stressful events and develop stress-related disorders and brains that do not:

  1. Epigenetics: the differing expression of genes related to external stimulation. Genetic predisposition to stress-related disorders (including PTSD and general anxiety) are implicated in studies showing that the same stressful experiences are recorded differently in the brain. While many people experience extreme stress in their lives, only between 10-20% of them develop a stress-related disorder.[1]
  2. GABA: the brain’s primary inhibitory neurotransmitter. When a lot of GABA is present in the dentate gyrus, there is less of an anxious response to a stressful situation: the molecular pathway outlined above is inhibited. Congruently, increased excitability of neurons leads to higher expression of memory consolidation genes.
  3. Hippocampus: the emotion processor involved with memory formation. A region of the hippocampus is important for the integration of emotional and cognitive data. When this area is functioning improperly, learning and memory are impaired. Additionally, the interplay between this region and the amygdala leads to decreased memory storage in the dentate gyrus. The lack of memory formation would directly affect the chance that someone who experiences a stressful event would remember it or develop a stress-related disorder.

 

It’s definitely a tricky situation with lots of interplay between genetic make-up, individual environment, and so many other factors that we as scientists do not understand and we as humans simply have to live with and help each other to live with.

[1] Reul, Johannes M.J.M. 2014. Making memories of stressful events: a journey along epigenetic, gene transcription, and signaling pathways. Frontiers in Psychiatry 5(5):1-11.

Alzheimer’s Disease: A Manifestation of Type II Diabetes on the Brain?

With current research enlightening a link between Type II Diabetes and the development of Alzheimer’s Disease through many mechanisms and risk factors, the role of insulin in the pathologies of both conditions is becoming a hot topic in medicine. Type II Diabetes increases the risk factor of developing dementia by two, and according to a 2004 study, the risk of developing Type II Diabetes is higher in Alzheimer’s patients.[1] Since the risk of developing either disease goes both ways, it is important to explore the big picture ways each disease advances and their overlap.

 

Insulin is a hormone that is synthesized in the pancreas, and has long been associated with Type II Diabetes. In a healthy system, insulin is released from the pancreas following a rise in blood sugar levels (after eating), and can bind to insulin receptors on a variety of cells throughout our bodies including fat, liver, muscles and even brain cells. The cellular pathways initiated by insulin binding to its receptors are myriad: they can have downstream effects as different as sugar storage and cell growth, among others.[2]

 

However, since the discovery of insulin receptors in the brain, scientists have investigated many more functions of insulin. Fascinatingly, insulin has been shown to play a role in protection of neurons, aiding with neuronal growth and survival, improving verbal memory and selective attention in healthy humans (Vieira et al., 2017). Most pertaining to Alzheimer’s is the implication of insulin in gene expression related to long term memory.

 

This crazy, tiny hormone does so many things for our bodies! It is chilling to think about what happens when insulin signalling goes wrong. When these signalling pathways do not get initiated the way they are supposed to (by insulin), we say that the system is exhibiting insulin resistance.

 

Both Alzheimer’s Disease and Type II Diabetes display insulin resistance as a primary molecular mechanism that leads to their development and worsening, but it is difficult to decide what really causes insulin resistance, and therefore what causes either disease. Many potential starting points have been proposed and are plausible: it is almost as if insulin resistance is cyclical, and we are jumping on to the mechanistic wheel in the middle of the disease propagation regardless of where we start.

 

After briefly examining the overlap between Type II Diabetes and Alzheimer’s, serious questions must be asked of the current health care system and its ability to provide effective and accessible healthcare to those living with Type II Diabetes and Alzheimer’s. The inventors of synthetic insulin sold their patent for only one dollar, with the intention that everyone who should need the drug would have access to it. Unfortunately, their desire to make their insulin accessible and affordable is not a reality, with the price of insulin nearly tripling within ten years (2002 to 2013). At a standard price of 480$ per vial, each of the 30 million Americans experiencing diabetes can pay thousands of dollars per year to get enough insulin to survive. If insulin mediation and other treatments for Type II Diabetes might be effective treatments for Alzheimer’s, as Vieira’s review article suggests, then the disadvantaged population has increased by almost 6 million.[3] Further, if Type II Diabetes and Alzheimer’s both play roles in the development of the other, then effective and affordable education and management options for Type II Diabetes are necessary to reduce the risk of Alzheimer’s, a brutal and debilitating disease.

[1]Vieira MNN, Lima-Filho RAS, De Felice FG. 2017. Connecting Alzheimer’s disease to diabetes: Underlying mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Neuropharmacology 136(2018):160-171.Neurochem Artstract 1Neurochem Artstract 1

[2] Vieira MNN, Lima-Filho RAS, De Felice FG. 2017. Connecting Alzheimer’s disease to diabetes: Underlying mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Neuropharmacology 136(2018):160-171.

[3] https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/facts-figures

Spam prevention powered by Akismet