What’s the Diction on Addiction? Current Knowledge on Substance Abuse and the Brain

We live in a world where daily news is riddled with stories of drug busts, cartel operations, and opioid overdoses. These problems are highly complex in nature, and we could talk for days about the psychology, reasoning, and socioeconomic factors that play into the whole drug trade system. Through all this complexity, however, there is one (fairly obvious) thing that binds it all together – the drugs themselves. What exactly are these mysterious substances, and why are they so valuable that thousands of people risk life and limb to obtain them for personal use, or keep them circulating around the world illegally? Down to the core, it all boils down to one controversial topic – addiction.

 

What is Addiction?

Let’s turn the tables for an instant. Have you ever felt you were, at some level, “addicted” to something? Perhaps chocolate, caffeine, or maybe even your cellular phone? Chances are, these things probably made you feel good in some way, which kept you coming back for more. It is quite well-known that many abusive substances and hard drugs are valued for their addictive properties and “feel-good” effects. This is a basic driving force that keeps such substances circulating throughout the modern world. The bottom line is, if people want it, then people will find a way to get it, even if obtaining the drug requires extreme measures. But what exactly is an addiction? To this day, the definition of this all-too-familiar word is still not 100% agreed upon.

A quick search on Merriam Webster will show that addiction and addictive behaviors are defined as a compulsive, chronic, need, either physiological or psychological, for something. That being said, there are two basic stances people tend to take when discussing the basis of addiction: physical and mental…

Physical – Addictive behaviors that stem from physical alteration of brain hardwiring and pathways. Someone is physically dependent on something addictive.

Mental – “Perceived” addiction. There are no physical changes in the brain, but the victim is led to believe that they need the addictive item or substance to go on.

So which is correct? The truth is, we don’t really know. While genetics and withdrawal symptoms can explain characteristics of physical addiction, questions such as “why do some people get addicted while others do not” might just play into the mental side of the hypothesis. We can broaden our knowledge, however, by studying what is already known about addiction in the brains of those who use drugs and hard substances. So what’s actually going on up there? Keep reading to find out!

Addiction is a compulsive, chronic, need, either physiological or psychological, for something.

 

It’s All in Your Head – Drugs and Physiology

Let’s think back to any time you’ve wanted more of something, like candy, for example. Perhaps eating one piece of candy made you feel great, and you may have reached back for another piece. Why? Humans and many other mammals have developed a system in the brain called the mesolimbic pathway. In simple terms, this pathway consists of tracts and areas of the brain that allow for feelings of pleasure or reward after doing a certain behavior, such as eating a piece of candy. 

Pay attention, in particular, to the blue dopamine pathway. Notice the “pleasurable” feelings normally produced in this pathway.

It all starts in an area of this pathway, called the Ventral Tegmental Area, or VTA. Doing a pleasurable action such as eating activates this area. Once activated, neurons from the VTA release dopamine (often credited with being the “feel good” neurotransmitter) to neurons in another part of the reward pathway, called the nucleus accumbens. When released, dopamine will hang around in the synapse (a small space between where two neurons communicate) for a short while and produce a pleasurable effect, and after a while, the neurons will take up or remove dopamine from the synapse so we don’t get carried away. Over time, neurons and neuronal connections in this learning-reward pathway can be strengthened or weakened. When learning from a behavior, the level of another neurotransmitter, glutamate, and dopamine elevate in the pathway and associated area of the brain. Through a process known as long term potentiation, neuronal connections can be strengthened, making neurons more sensitive and reactive to incoming signals. Such changes can result in reinforcing and strengthening behaviors. The video below does a good job summing up long term potentiation and the synapse:

 

 

Unfortunately, the chemical nature of this process allows for substances, such as drugs, to hijack the reward pathway and cause addiction. Often, this means increasing, in some way, the amount of dopamine in the synapse, which produces an extremely pleasurable feeling and keeps addicts reaching for more. In terms of learning, individuals associate pleasurable feelings with taking the drug, and thus the behavior is reinforced. Below are some common drugs and what they do at the synapse:

  • Methamphetamine: induces increased release of dopamine and norepinephrine (a neurotransmitter that has pain-killing effects, similar to adrenaline), blocks neurons from taking up excess dopamine, and prevents dopamine from being broken down
  • Opioids: inhibit the release of another neurotransmitter, called GABA. GABA is a neurotransmitter that normally decreases dopamine release 
  • Cocaine: prevents dopamine from being taken up by neurons, keeping it in the synapse longer and producing a prolonged feeling of reward 
  • That’s not to limit addiction to hard substances – anything that causes heightened dopamine release over time might become addictive (this includes sugar, caffeine, and even your cell phone!)

To make things worse, chronic use of any of these substances can cause synapses to grow (too much LTP and sensitization to drugs, producing amplified “high” feeling) and eventually shrink (to compensate for too much neurotransmitter). When synapses shrink, there are less AMPA receptors (covered in the linked article and video above), and normal amounts of dopamine are no longer enough to produce signals and thus feelings of pleasure. This means more dopamine is needed to set off the feeling of reward. This can partially explain withdrawal symptoms, and why addicts often find themselves in a vicious cycle of loading up on drugs to avoid the pain of withdrawal. Even after getting past the initial challenges of withdrawal, a single dose of drug is enough to cause relapse, as the physiological changes that occurred during addiction “primed” the brain to fall back into the cycle. Synapses might balloon to an irregular size again, similar to what happens after first exposure to a drug, which sensitizes the individual to the substance and again produces an amplified feeling of pleasure. These are the processes responsible for forming physical dependence and locking the “chains of addiction.” Is there a way out of this cycle?

An example of synaptic changes as a result of different degrees of cocaine use and periods of withdrawal

 

Can We Treat Addiction?

For many, addiction is viewed as a hopeless state, a cycle with no end. Despite advances in pharmaceuticals and therapy, addiction is still a crisis with thousands of victims every year. The social implications of addiction not only impacts those afflicted, but also their families, friends, and relatives. It’s a cycle that keeps victims away from what they love. Addiction is also the basis behind drug-related crimes, cartels, and the opioid epidemic that we have become increasingly desensitized to over the years. We’ve seen some of the intricate molecular changes that occur with addiction, and to some extent, it is nearly impossible for the brain to get back to exactly where it was before entering an addictive state. That’s not to mention psychological addiction, which is still a mystery in itself.

So can we really treat addiction? Like many things in science, there is likely a way, but we don’t exactly know where to start looking. But by studying the synapse, we can begin to find a solution for this deadly process that quite literally, is all in the head.

That’s also not to say there are no success stories in breaking free from addiction! For more information about addiction and treatment, you can visit this page here.

 

Addiction: Not a Choice.

We are all in largely unanimous agreement that having an addiction is not a good thing. The stigma surrounding drug addiction suggests that if I have an addiction it is my fault. Media representations of drug addicts are crazed, thrill-seeking hedonists or living for their next high junkies, stereotypes that diminish the experience of a drug addict and put people struggling with drug issues in a self-containing box. Anti-drug campaigns like “Just Say No” and “Say No to Drugs, Say Yes to Life” over-simplify the issue while blaming victims and addicts for their drug use.

The fact of the matter is: no one chooses to be addicted to drugs. No one wants to be an addict!

In actuality, there is a lot of misinformation thrown at us by propaganda and over-protective adults. Given that the global issue of drug use has become worse as policing and illegalization of drugs has increased, it is obvious that current methods for educating about and preventing drug abuse are ineffective. political anti-drug campaigns in the USA are founded chiefly upon racist ideologies that seek to incarcerate groups of people who stereotypically use specific drugs.

There are enough examples of how systematic oppression of minorities by racially targeted anti-drug campaigns. The big one is the War on Drugs. In the 1970s, the USA government began heavily policing and incarcerating for marijuana use. Is marijuana the worst thing ever? NO, but it just so happens that weed is associated with Black people. So, if governments could target marijuana users under the guise of ending drug use, the USA could throw everyone who they find using pot in prison and most of those people would turn out to be people of colour.[1] This schematic represents the number of people of colour who are incarcerated for drug offenses compared to the number of people of colour that make up the general population. It is quite clear that people of colour are drastically over represented in the prison system, despite using a comparable amount of drugs as the white population.[2]

[3]

Genetically speaking, some people are simply more prone to become addicted to drugs than others.[4] Drugs like cocaine and amphetamines trigger sustained activation of pleasure centres in the brain. The reward pathways are activated and sustained by dopamine, a hormone that populates the synapse as a result of natural rewards, and floods the synapse much more densely under the influence of stimulants. Under normal functioning, dopamine is very useful: it relieves stress, stimulates contentedness, and helps to regulate our desires. When we do something “good” like eating, our brains release dopamine into the reward pathway, which includes the VTA, OFC, and the thalamus.

[5]

It’s important to understand the societal implications and stigmas associated with drug addiction, because there is a lot more to it than a one-time choice.

 

[1]http://www.drugpolicy.org/issues/race-and-drug-war

[2]https://www.aclum.org/sites/default/files/styles/full_width/public/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/MarijuanaUseRates.jpg?itok=7ay-_qQ9

[3]http://www.drugpolicy.org/sites/default/files/styles/max_650x650/public/impact-of-drug-laws-on-black-and-latino-communities_1.png?itok=ikZkrHQM

[4]Ümit Sayın H*, A Schematic Overview of Addiction: Molecular Effects of Cocaine, Methamphetamine and Morphine on Limbic Neurons. Forensic Sci Add Res. 4(4). FSAR.000599.2019. DOI: 10.31031/FSAR.2019.04.000599

[5]https://d14rmgtrwzf5a.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/drugstargetthebrainspleasurecenter.gif

Addiction: Where to Place the Blame???

The debate about whether addiction is a disease or an active choice made by the individual has been around for centuries and has largely been an opinion based argument. However, in the past several decades, extensive research has been done to better understand the addiction. The research shows that the sustained use of drugs can alter synapse and lead to chemical imbalances of various neurotransmitters. Research has also shown that addiction shares several physiological pathways with other degenerative disease. This mounting evidence can be used, and rightly should be used to show that addiction is not a choice but rather a complex neurological disease. Classifying addiction as a disease will allow people struggling with the disorder to seek help without fear of ridicule.

Many drugs affect individuals in similar ways, the difference occurs in how symptoms. Drugs such as cocaine and amphetamines increase levels of dopamine within the neuron. This excess dopamine, which is the main neurotransmitter associated with pleasure binds with D1 receptors in the neuron which increase cAMP. The increase of cAMP  increases the activation of PKA and transcription factors such as CREB and delta FOS-B. These transcription factors, then transcribe specific segments of DNA which produces a multitude of proteins. The over activation of these proteins leads to changes in synapse and thus affects neural connections within the brain.

Ok so enough of the nerd talk. Addiction promotes a feel good response in the brain. The chemical that is responsible for this feeling has the ability to change how the brain is “wired” leading to dependence on the drug.  More simply put taking drugs change connections in the brain hard wiring users to take and crave the drug.

With the realization that those people addicted to drugs are no longer in control, where does a person put the blame. If an individual is hardwired for a drug, can they really be held responsible for doing things in order to obtain that drug? I’m not attempting to sway individuals one way or another, and honestly, I do not know when blame can be can be shifted from the user to the disease of addiction. Perhaps this depends in some part on the potency of the drug. Different drugs have different potentials thus allowing individuals to become addicted at different rates. Even the issue of initially taking the drug can become very convoluted upon further contemplation. Examining the various social and socioeconomic factors of drug addicts provides several similarities such as poverty, lack of education, violence, and potential even culture. These factors could be used to make the argument that individuals in these circumstances do not have a choice in the initial decision to take the drugs.

The issue of drug abuse and addiction is complicated from a variety of standpoints. The evidence that addiction is in fact a disease is strong. The mechanisms and pathways that various drugs affect synapse connections and neruochemical balances varies, however the feel good chemical dopamine seems to play a major role. The social factors surrounding addiction must also be considered when attempting to assign blame. Can blame be placed on a person who is designed for the drug? How prevalent are the social circumstances of the drug addict? Where does the blame go??

Sources

https://moodle.cord.edu/pluginfile.php/818256/mod_resource/content/0/Overview%20of%20addiction%202019.pdf

 

Finding a Treatment for Schizophrenia: Why So Complicated?

Mental illness is an ongoing problem in our world. In America alone, one in five adults experience a mental health issue. One in 25 Americans have a serious mental illness such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder. Even children can experience mental health problems. Several mental health disorders, including schizophrenia, show signs of development before a person turns 14, and 75% of disorders begin before age 24. That being said, less than 20% of children/adolescents with mental health problems receive treatment. Some mental health disorders are easily treatable with either therapy, medication, or both. Some of the more serious mental disorders, such as schizophrenia, are not so easily treatable. One reason why is because there has not been a ton of research regarding treatments.

 

What is schizophrenia?

Schizophrenia is a mental health disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally. Symptoms of schizophrenia include a range of problems in cognition, behavior, and emotion. Some symptoms include delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thinking, disorganized or abnormal motor behavior, and negative symptoms such as lack of emotion, loss of interest in everyday activities, or being socially withdrawn. Schizophrenia symptoms usually show up during adolescence. In men, it typically starts around early 20s, while in women it starts in the late 20s. People with schizophrenia require lifelong treatment. Early treatment is best but isn’t always the easiest.

Why is it so hard to treat?

Schizophrenia is a complicated illness to treat because we do not know the cause of it. Researchers have ideas that it is a combination of genetics, brain chemistry, and environmental factors, but are still unsure as to what causes the disorder to develop. Some believe neurotransmitters such as dopamine and glutamate may contribute to schizophrenia. Others believe it has to do with specific signaling pathways in the brain. These pathways include the Wnt signaling pathway, an important pathway in organism development Research has shown that problems with this pathway can lead to cognitive deficits in animal models, implying that it is involved in cognitive development. Problems in development may contribute to abnormalities resulting in mental disorders such as schizophrenia.

 

 

 

  • https://magellanhealthinsights.com/2018/05/23/7-mental-health-myths-and-facts/#targetText=Fact%3A%20Mental%20health%20problems%20are,bipolar%20disorder%2C%20or%20major%20depression
  • https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/schizophrenia/symptoms-causes/syc-20354443
  • https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/schizophrenia/schizophrenia-treatment-challenges
  • https://moodle.cord.edu/pluginfile.php/798923/mod_resource/content/2/2013%20wnt%20GSK%20and%20schizophrenia.pdf
  • Images
    • <p style=”font-size: 0.9rem;font-style: italic;”><a href=”https://www.flickr.com/photos/141608731@N06/38843081961″>”schizophrenia”</a><span>by <a href=”https://www.flickr.com/photos/141608731@N06″>johnbill552</a></span> is licensed under <a href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/?ref=ccsearch&atype=html” style=”margin-right: 5px;”>CC BY 2.0</a><a href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/?ref=ccsearch&atype=html” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer” style=”display: inline-block;white-space: none;opacity: .7;margin-top: 2px;margin-left: 3px;height: 22px !important;”><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc_icon.svg” /><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc-by_icon.svg” /></a></p>
    • <p style=”font-size: 0.9rem;font-style: italic;”><a href=”https://www.behance.net/gallery/81938079/Schizophrenia”>”Schizophrenia”</a><span> by <span>Ahmed Emad Eldin</span></span> is licensed under <a href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/?ref=ccsearch&atype=html” style=”margin-right: 5px;”>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</a><a href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/?ref=ccsearch&atype=html” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer” style=”display: inline-block;white-space: none;opacity: .7;margin-top: 2px;margin-left: 3px;height: 22px !important;”><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc_icon.svg” /><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc-by_icon.svg” /><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc-nc_icon.svg” /><img style=”height: inherit;margin-right: 3px;display: inline-block;” src=”https://search.creativecommons.org/static/img/cc-nd_icon.svg” /></a></p>

The Unlikely Duo: Alzheimer’s Disease and Type II Diabetes

Most people’s first thoughts are that there is no connection between Alzheimer’s disease and type II diabetes. Years ago that may have been true, but research today proves otherwise. In fact, people with type II diabetes are more likely to develop Alzheimer’s, and vice versa. More than 30 million people in the United States have diabetes – about 1 in 10 people. Between 90% and 95% of people with diabetes have type II diabetes. About 5.8 million people, of all ages, in the United States have Alzheimer’s. Roughly 1 in 10 people over the age of 65 has this disease. Alzheimer’s disease is the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States.

What is Alzheimer’s Disease?

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a type of dementia that effects memory, thinking, and behavior. AD usually occurs in old age, most people being over 65, but it can occur in younger people (early-onset Alzheimer’s). It is a progressive disease where symptoms become worse over time. This disease is only diagnosable post-mortem (after death).

               What is going on in the brain?

Though it is unknown exactly how AD starts, scientists do know two major abnormal structures that play a role in the pathology of the disease. The first are the presence of beta-amyloid plaques. These plaques are build-ups of the protein fragment, beta-amyloid. The second indicator is the presence of neurofibrillary tangles. These tangles are twisted fibers of the tau protein.

What is Type II Diabetes?

Type II diabetes (T2D) occurs when cells in the body, including in the brain, do not respond normally to insulin. Insulin is a hormone secreted by the pancreas to help regulate glucose (blood sugar) levels. Cells need glucose for energy. Normally, cells willingly take up glucose with the help of insulin. In T2D, cells don’t respond to the insulin, therefore not taking up glucose. This is called insulin resistance. Since glucose doesn’t enter the cells, the pancreas secretes more and more insulin until it eventually can’t keep up. Why T2D occurs is unknown but there are some risk factors including being overweight, fat distribution, inactivity, age, etc.

How are they connected?

Brains Chained by Addiction

The Pandemic of Addiction

The statistics surrounding addiction don’t lie, the U.S. has a pandemic on its hands. So what’s the situation?

In 2017, we saw a 9.6% increase in overdose deaths in the U.S. from 2016. That is a near ten percent jump in just one year. This isn’t a new issue. Also according to the CDC,  “During 2008–2011, an average of 1.1 million emergency department (ED) visits were made each year for drug poisoning, with a visit rate of 35.4 per 10,000 persons. Poisoning is the leading cause of injury-related mortality in the United States, with more than 40,000 deaths annually. Drugs account for 90% of poisoning deaths, and the number of deaths from drug poisoning has increased substantially in recent years.

If you’re interested in digging deeper, here’s the link to the CDC’s website, where the above statistics were taken from. If a quick video interview is more your style, check on the short video below.

Continue reading →

Is addiction a choice?

 

Addiction is a complex problem with many people disagreeing on what it is, how to treat it, and how addicts should be treated or not treated. One of the most hot button topics is whether addiction is a choice or not and by default, the fault of the person addicted. Let’s discuss the two sides and then look at what the science tells us.

 

Those who argue that addiction is a choice say that the individual made the first choice to ingest the drug and the consequences fall on their shoulders for what follows. Some may even say that those who are “psychologically weak” are the ones who get addicted and those who may be “psychologically stronger” could quit the drug whenever they wanted.

On the other hand, those who think addiction is not a choice may contend that while yes, the individual made the choice to ingest the drug, there may be other circumstances that led to that decision. Perhaps they were dealing with mental health issues and felt the need to self-medicate or were pressured by their friends. Additionally, people on this side of the issue often point to the horrible effects of chronic drug use and the torture of withdrawal to argue that no one would consciously choose that for themselves.

What’s the science behind it?

Now that we know some the aspects of public perception, let’s look at what the science supports.

 

Within our brain, there is something called the reward pathway. When this pathway is activated, it generates pleasurable emotions and also activates motivation systems that increase desire for that pleasurable feeling. Drugs like meth, cocaine, and opioids, stimulate parts of this pathway like the ventral tegmental area and the nucleus accumbens with an excess amount of dopamine compared to our everyday stimuli. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that controls our reaction and feelings of pleasure. When people don’t take the drug, their body begins to crave that pleasurable feeling given by the drug since the body has become accustomed to the higher levels of dopamine produced by the drug.

Let’s use meth as an example to see how this pathway works. Meth can inter a neuron and replace dopamine causing it to be pushed out into the cell. Similarly, the drug can also block the re-uptake of excess dopamine back into the neuron. Both of these interactions increase the amount of dopamine in the synapse leading to that pleasurable feeling.

However, this pleasurable feeling given by the excess of dopamine creates a craving for more in the brain when meth is not being used. The everyday levels of dopamine given off are no longer enough because the synapse has changed to accommodate the increase of dopamine. Not only is our body craving dopamine, but other downstream factors have been altered.  When there is an excess of firing from dopamine receptors, there is increased phosphorylation of CAMP which then leads to the expression of immediate early genes (IEG) like c-fos. These IEG’s start a cascade of other events that may form addictive behavior as well as molecular changes that lead to synaptic plasticity and long term potentiation. Essentially, after becoming addicted to drugs, the systems in your brain physically change making it harder and harder for you to quit.

So is it a choice or not?

Therefore, the actual process of becoming addicted to a drug is not a choice. Individuals may disagree on the importance of personal responsibility of first ingesting the drug but there is no scientific disagreement on the strength of the biological processes that addiction creates. Your brain has been physically altered, there is no “psychologically strong” or “psychologically weak” because all our brains can become victim to this process. If you are interested in learning more about addiction and it’s effects, visit https://www.samhsa.gov/public-messages

Party in the Cleft

Evolutionarily, humans have been wired to perceive feelings of pleasure based on certain stimuli that are associated with survival of the individual or species. Stimuli that evoke this reward system include sexual pleasure, foods, drinks, and success to list a few. Stimuli activate the mesolimbic dopamine pathway which originates in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). When VTA neurons are activated, dopamine release is increased at the synaptic cleft of the nucleus accumbens (NA). Both the NA and the VTA are associated with motivation due to the long-term potentiation that occurs. Under natural stimuli, dopamine is invited to the cleft tea time party and leaves after a short while. However, humans have found and developed different more intense ways to satisfy the reward system that aren’t natural “survival stimuli.” The use of drugs.

Drugs activate the same reward pathway which is a large proponent of their addictive nature. Mainly, drugs act to increase dopamine and other neurotransmitters in the synaptic cleft of the NA to induce the feelings of pleasure. Dopamine causes D1 receptors to fire action potentials which then begins a signal cascade in the neurons. If neurons are fired regularly, AMPA receptors increase in number and become more active which leads to long term potentiation and memory formation. Continual use also changes the size and shape of neurons. Once neurons change, they are unlikely to return to the original form.

NIDA-NIH

Increasing dopamine and other neurotransmitters in the cleft can be achieved in many ways and therefore is variable for different drugs. Below are a few commonly used drugs and how they increase dopamine in the cleft.

  • Cocaine inhibits the re-uptake of dopamine, allowing the dopamine to act for a longer period of time at higher concentrations.
  • Opioids inhibit GABA which inhibits dopamine, therefore increasing dopamine activity.

Cocaine and opioids are addictive because of the increased D1 activation that induces a signal cascade resulting in synaptic plasticity, memory formation in the motivation centers.

In the recruitment of dopamine and norepinephrine to the cleft party, cocaine and opioids are sorely incompetent compared to methamphetamine. Cocaine and opioids throw an intimate slumber party with only their closest friends while methamphetamine invites the whole college campus and advertises free root beer at a weekend long music festival.

  • Methamphetamine induces the release of dopamine in four different ways, induces the release of norepinephrine in two ways, blocks re-uptake of the neurotransmitters, and blocks their degradation.

For this reason, methamphetamine is highly addictive and difficult to quit. Even small amounts of methamphetamine cause massive recruitment of neurotransmitters. The neurotransmitters induce the same signaling pathway through D1 receptors and leads to the expression of genes that are associated with addictive behaviors. Some of these genes encode proteins that are further involved in long term potentiation and learning, such as in the case for delta FosB. These processes cause damage to the synapse that can never fully be repaired.

Therefore, methamphetamine addiction should be avoided at all costs or treated early on. Even early treatment may not be enough to reverse the damage that has been done. Though these drugs provide incredible rewards for an individual, their temporary effects are not worth the lifelong consequences.

Schizophrenia: Reality vs Stigma

Schizophrenia: What is it and how do we treat it?

Schizophrenia is one of the most challenging mental illnesses to manage and function with. Symptoms often interfere with reality, having a significant impact on relationships and a person’s ability to function within the “normal” expectations of society. First, for a quick one-minute overview, check out this video from the National Alliance on Mental Health.

Medications, which are typically antipsychotics, are far from perfect, or even decent; the side effects are horrendous and can be permanent, many medications don’t work well or only treat certain symptoms, and constant dose adjustments must be made to maximize efficiency while limiting negative effects. Due to these problems, many patients with schizophrenia refuse to stay on their medications, raising difficult questions for family members and physicians. Check out this website from the Mayo Clinic for some basic information about schizophrenia and its treatments.

Continue reading →

Sugar on the Brain: Alzheimer’s Disease

What’s the story?

Over the past decade, sugar has become an increasingly hot topic as a part of our diets. Updated recommendations have been in the news as recent as two days ago, which you can check out here.

Various cities and states have  implemented (or tried to implement) sugary drink taxes to try and curb their populations’ never ending enthusiasm for these addictive sugar-laden foods. Many of the consequences of very high sugar intake are well known, like weight gain and type II diabetes. However, what a lot of people don’t know is how tightly linked diabetes and the development of Alzheimer’s are.

 

However, what a lot of people don’t know is how tightly linked diabetes and the development of Alzheimer’s are.

 

According to Mayo Clinic, a variety of studies have linked Alzheimer’s disease with diabetes, especially type two diabetes. While some studies are inconclusive and the mechanisms are poorly understood, there is certainly some connection between insulin signaling in the brain and the development of Alzheimer’s disease. In fact, many people with diabetes have changes in the brain that are indicative of both Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. This may also contribute to the symptoms being seen, separate from an Alzheimer’s diagnosis. If you want to read more, here’s the article.

Continue reading →

Spam prevention powered by Akismet