Autism is a developmental disorder associated with dysfunction in social interaction and communication. Those diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often engage in repetitive behaviors and/or interests. It’s important the diagnosis is labeled as a spectrum because there is a wide variety of symptomology that can fall on the scale. Some diagnosed are completely non-verbal and need daily care for the entirety of their lives while others go on to be esteemed professors in their field of interest.
What is different in an autistic brain?
There is not just one thing that is different in autism, making it a difficult disorder to pin down. Essentially, there are a number of variables that can influence the development of ASD including genetics environmental factors. Genetically, mutations in a variety of different proteins and genes are seen like SHANK, UBE3A, TSC1-TSC2, and others. Environmentally, increased age of the parents, pregnancy complications and exposure to some teratogens can increase the probability of ASD.
Let’s look at two examples of issues with proteins to see where some of the problems may be occurring:
The protein UBE3A degrades a protein called ARC. The main job of ARC is to reduce the amount of excitatory information by pruning at the synapse. When there are mutations of UBE31, ARC cannot do its job of reducing AMPA channel recruitments and pruning at a normal level and is often overexpressed.
Similarly, problems with genes encoding SHANK proteins are seen in individuals with ASD. Changes and communication need to be made regularly at the synapse and when the genes that help with the changes and communications mutate and don’t encode correctly, we see some of the behavioral issues known to be present in ASD like repetitive routines and anxiety-like phenotypes. One study on Shank2 suggested that mutations in the gene encoding process are alleviated by a partial agonist of NMDA receptor function suggesting that problems with NMDA receptors may be an important indicator of ASD.
What treatments are available
SHANK3 is one of the genes that encode the SHANK family of proteins. Some have found that restoration of SHANK3 levels in adulthood may be helpful in alleviating some of the impairments created by its mutations. This may seem like a step in the right direction but not everybody feels the same way. The video below talks a little more about the SHANK3 gene and how it works.
Some individuals in the autistic community take issue with the word “cure” as they don’t feel there is anything to be cured. For some, the diagnosis is an important aspect of their personality and not a detriment but an asset to their lives. It can be argued that trying to “cure” autism is simply trying to make sure everyone fits into the neuro-typical mold and eliminates variance in society. While there are those whose lives are severely impacted by ASD and are in immense pain and discomfort, we must be wary of labeling things a “treatment” versus a “cure” as those terms can mean different things to different people. If we “cured” autism, we may not have had Hans Christian Andersen’s famous children’s stories or Bobby Fischer’s incredible chess talent. Yet, we must not point to celebrity success as the only reason ASD should not be eliminated as each individual contributes uniquely to society.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a debilitating development disorder. Frequent signs include impairments in social interactions and communication, and restricted, repetitive and stereotyped behaviors or interests. Autism is typically diagnosed in ages 2-3 but can sometimes be diagnosed later in life, especially in females. ASD is primarily a genetic disorder but can also be due to mutations. Some of these are:
Fragile X syndrome – Caused by a mutation in the FMR1 gene which is found on the X chromosome. People have a longer FMR1 in FXS and it cannot produce FMRP which is crucial to brain development. Because of its location on the X chromosome, it is more likely that males are diagnosed with FXS.
Tuberous sclerosis complex – Caused by a mutation in TSC1 or TSC2 which encode a tumor suppressor. Because of this, people with this typically have benign tumors in multiple organs.
Angelman syndrome – A genetic development disorder due to the loss of the gene UBE3A. It is similar to ASD but typically has more severe signs such as seizures, ataxia (lack of coordination), strange fascination in water and more.
Timothy syndrome – Mutation in the CACN1C gene and is also known for its complication in heart problems, digits and malfunction of central and peripheral nervous systems.
Rett syndrome – A gene called MECP2 is supposed to help normalize the function of nerve cells. In ASD, this gene in under expressed and doesn’t work properly.
Due to the increasing diagnoses of ASD, it is important to understand what is happening deep down. Autism is something that one is born with, but is not diagnosed until certain developmental bench marks are missed. Autism is diagnosed and then a spectrum is used to help define the severity. Some who are high functioning are considered to have Asperger’s. Autism is a complex disease and affects each person differently. However, even though they have a disease, they are still people living their life.
Researchers are continuously searching for ways to help better the lives of those with autism, especially those who are non verbal and cannot express their pain or emotions. Probiotics and changing children’s diets have been found to help behavior and those with autism also suffer from some sort of digestive problem.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) manifests itself in early childhood during development. Behaviorally, ASD is commonly marked by challenges with social interaction, motor impairment, and unusual, repetitive behaviors. ASD has been found to be associated with the development of excitatory and inhibitory synapses. The excitatory synapses mature, and the inhibitory synapses develop during the earlier stages of childhood, around the time children are usually diagnosed. Due to this, ASD is correlated with synaptogenesis. Specifically, the synaptic adhesion molecules, neuroligin and neurexin, have often been linked to ASD. When a synapse forms, cell adhesion molecules (CAM) recruit neurexin and neuroligin which then link the two neurons through a heterophilic dimer. Neurexin and neuroligin then lead to the recruitment of receptors and ion channels that establish communication at the synapse. Many mutations of the genes that encode these proteins result in behaviors similar to that of autism in animal models. Neurexin and neuroligin are associated with neuro transmission and synaptic plasticity and may have a role in ASD. The SHANK scaffold proteins function in synapse morphology and function and have also been correlated to ASD behavior. However, the underlying causes of ASD still remain elusive.
But there is evidence that specific genes are linked to activity-dependent neuronal signaling that may be involved in autism. Many of these specific genes have mutations that cause other developmental disorders such as fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis complex, Angelman syndrome, Timothy syndrome, and Rett syndrome. The mechanisms of these disorders may provide insight into the root of ASD.
Fragile X Syndrome: The mutation of FMR1 leads to decreased expression of the transcription repressor FMRP. The expression of ARC protein increases which acts in removing AMPA receptors causing long term depression.
Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: TSC1 and TSC2 inhibit the activity of mTOR which typically leads to the expression of proteins, thereby inhibiting protein synthesis. A mutation in TSC1 or TSC2 can impair their function. Similarly, binding of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or a mutation in the AKT repressor, PTEN, both of which inhibit the activity of TSC1 and TSC2. This leads to excessive protein synthesis.
Angelman Syndrome: UBE3A is a ubiquitin ligase, meaning it marks proteins for degradation by the proteasome. In Angelman syndrome, UBE3A function is impaired. ARC protein is one of the proteins marked by UBE3A and because of the loss in functionality, ARC is present at high levels and decreases the AMPA receptors.
Timothy Syndrome: A certain Ca2+ channel is mutated, impairing channel inactivation which elevates the Ca2+ concentration in the cell. This could inhibit activity-dependent gene transcription.
Rett Syndrome: A mutation in MECP2, a transcription repressor, causing an imbalance between inhibition and excitation.
All these mechanisms affect activity-dependent signaling, specifically in synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity, both of which are implicated in ASD. Therefore, these mechanisms may be a starting point for further research into the underlying mechanisms of ASD. This could include researching genes that are associated with ASD that are involved in activity-dependent signaling. Such research could ultimately provide treatment for severe cognitive impairments that are expressed in some individuals on the spectrum.
Many of us out there are coffee drinkers. I myself have at least one cup every morning. I will admit, yes, I am slightly addicted to my morning coffee. But am it’s not really the coffee I am addicted to. It’s the caffeine in the coffee that wakes me up every morning.
According to the American Psychiatric Association, addiction is a disease that is caused by compulsive substance use despite harmful consequences. People who have an addiction or multiple addictions, are no longer able to control their will to use the substance or not to. The most common substance people become addicted to are drugs including alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine, and opioids, among several others.
People use drugs to feel good, feel better, to do better, or just out of sheer curiosity. Some people just want to feel good or to experience the high that accompanies several drugs. Others, such as those with anxiety or depression, use drugs because it makes them feel better. Some use because they believe it helps them perform better at certain tasks. But no matter the reason people use drugs, the same pathways are activated in the brain.
The pathway that gets activated when a person uses a drug is the mesolimbic dopamine pathway. This is also known as the reward pathway. This pathway involves the release of dopamine. Rewards such as food, sex, or some sort of drug increase the concentration of dopamine in the brain.
When someone drinks a cup of coffee, this same mesolimbic pathway releases dopamine. This causes the person to feel good. Because of this, the person associates drinking coffee with feeling good. The more coffee the person drinks, the more caffeine they consume. Caffeine is a stimulant that causes chemical changes in the brain. Consuming caffeine on a daily basis can build up a tolerance to the caffeine, requiring more and more to feel the same effects as before. When someone like this does consume caffeine one day, they may experience a headache or shakiness, because the body is not used to not having caffeine in it.
So, what about drugs such as cocaine? Cocaine is a powerful stimulant, just like caffeine. It acts as a mood modulator and anti-depressant. So far this sounds pretty good. But the effects of cocaine only last for about 30 minutes. After that, to feel the same effects, more of the drug would have to be consumed. When cocaine is consumed, it binds to dopamine transporters on the cell’s membrane. Here, it blocks the cell from from being able to reuptake the dopamine molecules that are present from being released from the mesolimbic pathway. This further increases the concentration of dopamine and its probability of binding to its receptors. So, similarly to caffeine, a person has to take more and more to feel the same effects as the first time.
In the end, caffeine addictions and cocaine addictions arise from the same cause: dopamine. They both call for the need to use more and more. They both can lead to withdrawal symptoms when not consumed. The difference between the two is that one is more socially acceptable than the other. More people consume caffeine every day than cocaine. So how come one is seen as a problem and the other is not?
It’s their fault. They made that choice. Why should I help them. All they will do is spend the money on drugs. These are all things many of us have heard in person, on the radio, on tv or even a song. Addiction is a scary and complex thing. It’s hard on the addict, friends, and family. However, we often hear “it’s their fault. They made the choice” but did they really make the choice or was there something deep down out of their control?
Humans are pleasure seeking creatures which is triggered by neurotransmitters such as glutamate, dopamine, oxytocin and norepinephrine. Through these neurotransmitters, the reward-pleasure pathway incentivizing behavior. But these can also be triggered through the use of drugs such as opioids, cocaine and amphetamines. Therefore, the use of drugs is associated with a synthetic high with effects of euphoria, increased libido, enhanced sexual pleasure and more.
Cocaine and amphetamines increase the amount of dopamine in a neuron binding to receptors called D1. A cascade of events occurs, but the most important is the increase in two transcription factors, CREB and FOS-B. This increase in transcription factor causes more proteins to be produced than normal and affects the neural connections within the brain. Now, understanding slightly better what happens deep in the brain. So, is addiction within a person’s control?
It depends. Yes, there is the choice to take a drug but after that initial taste. However, many can’t stop because their brain is telling them they cannot function without it. Caffeine is an addiction on a smaller scale. When you have caffeine every morning and afternoon and then decide to quit cold turkey. You experience headaches, drowsiness, changes in mood and more. This is because you rapidly took something away your brain depended on. This, but on a more extreme is what happens to addicts.
A recent study published explained one possible treatment of addiction is through giving oxytocin. This is a neuro stimulus that many of us receive through our mothers. It provides a sense of well-being and connectedness. But, if someone was deprived and doesn’t produce enough oxytocin. Is it their fault that they unintentionally crave this sense of well-being/connectedness and the only similar feeling is through drugs? It is not only nurturing that impacts addicts but also nature. Some people are more predisposed than others genetically. There are many other factors that should be considered before directly blaming and shaming the addict. This way of thought will help eliminate the negative connotation of addiction and possibly help develop a better way of preventing and helping drug addicts.
Drugs have been a controversial part of American culture practically since its infancy. For centuries, scholars have argued about the role of alcohol all while Americans celebrate its use. Most people remember some sort of anti-drug education in their schools, whether it be the DARE program or public service announcements (PSAs). All of this anti-drug propaganda seems to have sparked a bit of a controversy, mainly surrounding whether or not these drugs are that harmful in the first place. While this is certainly a compelling debate, the answer cannot be reached without looking at the science behind these drugs.
In the article, A Schematic Overview of Addiction: Molecular Effects of Cocaine, Methamphetamine and Morphine on Limbic Neurons, researchers summarize the neurological effects of three major drugs: cocaine, methamphetamine, and opioids like morphine and heroine[ii].
Cocaine
Cocaine is a stimulant, much like the common drug caffeine. Like other stimulants, cocaine pushes the body into action, making us feel elevated, excited, focused, and eager to do things. Cocaine mainly interacts with dopamine, a chemical involved in the reward pathway. Dopamine is also responsible for the pleasurable feeling that comes from using drugs. In the normal brain, dopamine is released from the neuron and then binds to receptor on the next neuron. After it has done its job, dopamine gets picked by a transport protein. (The figure below outlines the basics of neurotransmitter reuptake). Cocaine prevents this last part from happening. Thus, dopamine’s affect is increased, leading to increased pleasure and reward.
Methamphetamine, or meth as it is more commonly known, is also a stimulant. However, there are few major differences between it and cocaine. For one thing, methamphetamine lasts a lot longer, mainly because it has a stronger effect on dopamine and other chemicals. Like cocaine, methamphetamine can block the transport proteins that take up dopamine, but it can trigger the release dopamine as well. Additionally, methamphetamine triggers the release of norepinephrine, another neurotransmitter involved in the reward pathway.
Unlike methamphetamine and cocaine, heroin and other opioids are sedatives or depressants (like alcohol). These drugs generally produce a more relaxed feeling, rather than one of excitement and “let’s get things done”. Opioids still produce a strong sense of euphoria.
Your brain naturally has a set of opioid receptors. Normally, neurotransmitters like endorphin bind to these receptors. However, drugs like heroin can mimic these neurotransmitters and produce a similar response. These receptors are linked to special proteins called the g protein. When heroin or other opioids binds to the receptor, the alpha sub-unit of the g protein breaks away. This process is aided by GTP. Opioids increase the activity of GTP.
Additionally, these g proteins are linked to various calcium and potassium channels within the neuron. (For a brief summary on the g protein, click here). When activated, the g protein helps close these channels. This makes the inside of the neuron more negative in terms of charge, preventing it from firing. This is what causes the sedative effect of opioids. (Note: this occurs because opioids interact with a specific type of g protein. A list of the different types of g proteins can be found here).
Why does this matter in the debate?
Whether a depressant like heroin or a stimulant like cocaine, all drugs trigger the release of dopamine. While dopamine is capable of exciting a neuron, in this case it mostly inhibits the inhibitory neurons. Think of this like a double negative. Inhibition of inhibition leads to excitation. A side effect of this excitation is the release of glutamate and the subsequent recruitment of AMPA receptors. This helps our brain remember where the pleasurable stimulus came from and makes us more likely to seek it again. This is what leads to addiction.
Addiction, in a certain light, is more or less a mechanism of how substances take over the brain, controlling wants and cravings for the substance. Addiction can be a terrible thing. It is also incredibly complex and difficult to treat, which is why some advocates for legalization/decriminalization of drugs have simply given up and said “let them do it.” If drugs like methamphetamine, cocaine, and heroin are going to be legalized, then they need to be deemed safe to use. The safety of this drugs is something the researchers acknowledge is not really well known[v]. There is some information. Both cocaine and methamphetamine can lead to heart problems, and potentially lead to a state of psychosis similar to schizophrenia. A lot of the dangers of using these drugs comes from impurities. Dealers often mix drugs like heroin with other illicit drugs or substances to either cut cost or alter the affect. These substances often have terrible side effects and can exacerbate the side effects of the original drug. Legalizing drugs is theorized to cut down on these impurities and the dangers associated with them. Now, how much of the danger of using illegal drugs comes from impurities and how much comes from the drugs themselves is unknown at this time.
Knowing the science on addiction really showcases it as the complex issue that it is. There are multiple chemical pathways of addiction. It affects nearly every area of the brain, and in different ways. Looking at the science behind these drugs and addiction in general shifts the debate from vilifying drugs and those who are addicted to them to discussing how to properly solve the problem of addiction.
We live in a world where daily news is riddled with stories of drug busts, cartel operations, and opioid overdoses. These problems are highly complex in nature, and we could talk for days about the psychology, reasoning, and socioeconomic factors that play into the whole drug trade system. Through all this complexity, however, there is one (fairly obvious) thing that binds it all together – the drugs themselves. What exactly are these mysterious substances, and why are they so valuable that thousands of people risk life and limb to obtain them for personal use, or keep them circulating around the world illegally? Down to the core, it all boils down to one controversial topic – addiction.
What is Addiction?
Let’s turn the tables for an instant. Have you ever felt you were, at some level, “addicted” to something? Perhaps chocolate, caffeine, or maybe even your cellular phone? Chances are, these things probably made you feel good in some way, which kept you coming back for more. It is quite well-known that many abusive substances and hard drugs are valued for their addictive properties and “feel-good” effects. This is a basic driving force that keeps such substances circulating throughout the modern world. The bottom line is, if people want it, then people will find a way to get it, even if obtaining the drug requires extreme measures. But what exactly is an addiction? To this day, the definition of this all-too-familiar word is still not 100% agreed upon.
A quick search on Merriam Webster will show that addiction and addictive behaviors are defined as a compulsive, chronic, need, either physiological or psychological, for something. That being said, there are two basic stances people tend to take when discussing the basis of addiction: physical and mental…
Physical – Addictive behaviors that stem from physical alteration of brain hardwiring and pathways. Someone is physically dependent on something addictive.
Mental – “Perceived” addiction. There are no physical changes in the brain, but the victim is led to believe that they need the addictive item or substance to go on.
So which is correct? The truth is, we don’t really know. While genetics and withdrawal symptoms can explain characteristics of physical addiction, questions such as “why do some people get addicted while others do not” might just play into the mental side of the hypothesis. We can broaden our knowledge, however, by studying what is already known about addiction in the brains of those who use drugs and hard substances. So what’s actually going on up there? Keep reading to find out!
Addiction is a compulsive, chronic, need, either physiological or psychological, for something.
It’s All in Your Head – Drugs and Physiology
Let’s think back to any time you’ve wanted more of something, like candy, for example. Perhaps eating one piece of candy made you feel great, and you may have reached back for another piece. Why? Humans and many other mammals have developed a system in the brain called the mesolimbic pathway. In simple terms, this pathway consists of tracts and areas of the brain that allow for feelings of pleasure or reward after doing a certain behavior, such as eating a piece of candy.
Pay attention, in particular, to the blue dopamine pathway. Notice the “pleasurable” feelings normally produced in this pathway.
It all starts in an area of this pathway, called the Ventral Tegmental Area, or VTA. Doing a pleasurable action such as eating activates this area. Once activated, neurons from the VTA release dopamine (often credited with being the “feel good” neurotransmitter) to neurons in another part of the reward pathway, called the nucleus accumbens. When released, dopamine will hang around in the synapse (a small space between where two neurons communicate) for a short while and produce a pleasurable effect, and after a while, the neurons will take up or remove dopamine from the synapse so we don’t get carried away. Over time, neurons and neuronal connections in this learning-reward pathway can be strengthened or weakened. When learning from a behavior, the level of another neurotransmitter, glutamate, and dopamine elevate in the pathway and associated area of the brain. Through a process known as long term potentiation, neuronal connections can be strengthened, making neurons more sensitive and reactive to incoming signals. Such changes can result in reinforcing and strengthening behaviors. The video below does a good job summing up long term potentiation and the synapse:
Unfortunately, the chemical nature of this process allows for substances, such as drugs, to hijack the reward pathway and cause addiction. Often, this means increasing, in some way, the amount of dopamine in the synapse, which produces an extremely pleasurable feeling and keeps addicts reaching for more. In terms of learning, individuals associate pleasurable feelings with taking the drug, and thus the behavior is reinforced. Below are some common drugs and what they do at the synapse:
Methamphetamine: induces increased release of dopamine and norepinephrine (a neurotransmitter that has pain-killing effects, similar to adrenaline), blocks neurons from taking up excess dopamine, and prevents dopamine from being broken down
Opioids: inhibit the release of another neurotransmitter, called GABA. GABA is a neurotransmitter that normally decreases dopamine release
Cocaine: prevents dopamine from being taken up by neurons, keeping it in the synapse longer and producing a prolonged feeling of reward
That’s not to limit addiction to hard substances – anything that causes heightened dopamine release over time might become addictive (this includes sugar, caffeine, and even your cell phone!)
To make things worse, chronic use of any of these substances can cause synapses to grow (too much LTP and sensitization to drugs, producing amplified “high” feeling) and eventually shrink (to compensate for too much neurotransmitter). When synapses shrink, there are less AMPA receptors (covered in the linked article and video above), and normal amounts of dopamine are no longer enough to produce signals and thus feelings of pleasure. This means more dopamine is needed to set off the feeling of reward. This can partially explain withdrawal symptoms, and why addicts often find themselves in a vicious cycle of loading up on drugs to avoid the pain of withdrawal. Even after getting past the initial challenges of withdrawal, a single dose of drug is enough to cause relapse, as the physiological changes that occurred during addiction “primed” the brain to fall back into the cycle. Synapses might balloon to an irregular size again, similar to what happens after first exposure to a drug, which sensitizes the individual to the substance and again produces an amplified feeling of pleasure. These are the processes responsible for forming physical dependence and locking the “chains of addiction.” Is there a way out of this cycle?
An example of synaptic changes as a result of different degrees of cocaine use and periods of withdrawal
Can We Treat Addiction?
For many, addiction is viewed as a hopeless state, a cycle with no end. Despite advances in pharmaceuticals and therapy, addiction is still a crisis with thousands of victims every year. The social implications of addiction not only impacts those afflicted, but also their families, friends, and relatives. It’s a cycle that keeps victims away from what they love. Addiction is also the basis behind drug-related crimes, cartels, and the opioid epidemic that we have become increasingly desensitized to over the years. We’ve seen some of the intricate molecular changes that occur with addiction, and to some extent, it is nearly impossible for the brain to get back to exactly where it was before entering an addictive state. That’s not to mention psychological addiction, which is still a mystery in itself.
So can we really treat addiction? Like many things in science, there is likely a way, but we don’t exactly know where to start looking. But by studying the synapse, we can begin to find a solution for this deadly process that quite literally, is all in the head.
That’s also not to say there are no success stories in breaking free from addiction! For more information about addiction and treatment, you can visit this page here.
We are all in largely unanimous agreement that having an addiction is not a good thing. The stigma surrounding drug addiction suggests that if I have an addiction it is my fault. Media representations of drug addicts are crazed, thrill-seeking hedonists or living for their next high junkies, stereotypes that diminish the experience of a drug addict and put people struggling with drug issues in a self-containing box. Anti-drug campaigns like “Just Say No” and “Say No to Drugs, Say Yes to Life” over-simplify the issue while blaming victims and addicts for their drug use.
The fact of the matter is: no one chooses to be addicted to drugs. No one wants to be an addict!
In actuality, there is a lot of misinformation thrown at us by propaganda and over-protective adults. Given that the global issue of drug use has become worse as policing and illegalization of drugs has increased, it is obvious that current methods for educating about and preventing drug abuse are ineffective. political anti-drug campaigns in the USA are founded chiefly upon racist ideologies that seek to incarcerate groups of people who stereotypically use specific drugs.
There are enough examples of how systematic oppression of minorities by racially targeted anti-drug campaigns. The big one is the War on Drugs. In the 1970s, the USA government began heavily policing and incarcerating for marijuana use. Is marijuana the worst thing ever? NO, but it just so happens that weed is associated with Black people. So, if governments could target marijuana users under the guise of ending drug use, the USA could throw everyone who they find using pot in prison and most of those people would turn out to be people of colour.[1] This schematic represents the number of people of colour who are incarcerated for drug offenses compared to the number of people of colour that make up the general population. It is quite clear that people of colour are drastically over represented in the prison system, despite using a comparable amount of drugs as the white population.[2]
Genetically speaking, some people are simply more prone to become addicted to drugs than others.[4] Drugs like cocaine and amphetamines trigger sustained activation of pleasure centres in the brain. The reward pathways are activated and sustained by dopamine, a hormone that populates the synapse as a result of natural rewards, and floods the synapse much more densely under the influence of stimulants. Under normal functioning, dopamine is very useful: it relieves stress, stimulates contentedness, and helps to regulate our desires. When we do something “good” like eating, our brains release dopamine into the reward pathway, which includes the VTA, OFC, and the thalamus.
It’s important to understand the societal implications and stigmas associated with drug addiction, because there is a lot more to it than a one-time choice.
The debate about whether addiction is a disease or an active choice made by the individual has been around for centuries and has largely been an opinion based argument. However, in the past several decades, extensive research has been done to better understand the addiction. The research shows that the sustained use of drugs can alter synapse and lead to chemical imbalances of various neurotransmitters. Research has also shown that addiction shares several physiological pathways with other degenerative disease. This mounting evidence can be used, and rightly should be used to show that addiction is not a choice but rather a complex neurological disease. Classifying addiction as a disease will allow people struggling with the disorder to seek help without fear of ridicule.
Many drugs affect individuals in similar ways, the difference occurs in how symptoms. Drugs such as cocaine and amphetamines increase levels of dopamine within the neuron. This excess dopamine, which is the main neurotransmitter associated with pleasure binds with D1 receptors in the neuron which increase cAMP. The increase of cAMP increases the activation of PKA and transcription factors such as CREB and delta FOS-B. These transcription factors, then transcribe specific segments of DNA which produces a multitude of proteins. The over activation of these proteins leads to changes in synapse and thus affects neural connections within the brain.
Ok so enough of the nerd talk. Addiction promotes a feel good response in the brain. The chemical that is responsible for this feeling has the ability to change how the brain is “wired” leading to dependence on the drug. More simply put taking drugs change connections in the brain hard wiring users to take and crave the drug.
With the realization that those people addicted to drugs are no longer in control, where does a person put the blame. If an individual is hardwired for a drug, can they really be held responsible for doing things in order to obtain that drug? I’m not attempting to sway individuals one way or another, and honestly, I do not know when blame can be can be shifted from the user to the disease of addiction. Perhaps this depends in some part on the potency of the drug. Different drugs have different potentials thus allowing individuals to become addicted at different rates. Even the issue of initially taking the drug can become very convoluted upon further contemplation. Examining the various social and socioeconomic factors of drug addicts provides several similarities such as poverty, lack of education, violence, and potential even culture. These factors could be used to make the argument that individuals in these circumstances do not have a choice in the initial decision to take the drugs.
The issue of drug abuse and addiction is complicated from a variety of standpoints. The evidence that addiction is in fact a disease is strong. The mechanisms and pathways that various drugs affect synapse connections and neruochemical balances varies, however the feel good chemical dopamine seems to play a major role. The social factors surrounding addiction must also be considered when attempting to assign blame. Can blame be placed on a person who is designed for the drug? How prevalent are the social circumstances of the drug addict? Where does the blame go??
Mental illness is an ongoing problem in our world. In America alone, one in five adults experience a mental health issue. One in 25 Americans have a serious mental illness such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder. Even children can experience mental health problems. Several mental health disorders, including schizophrenia, show signs of development before a person turns 14, and 75% of disorders begin before age 24. That being said, less than 20% of children/adolescents with mental health problems receive treatment. Some mental health disorders are easily treatable with either therapy, medication, or both. Some of the more serious mental disorders, such as schizophrenia, are not so easily treatable. One reason why is because there has not been a ton of research regarding treatments.
What is schizophrenia?
Schizophrenia is a mental health disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally. Symptoms of schizophrenia include a range of problems in cognition, behavior, and emotion. Some symptoms include delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thinking, disorganized or abnormal motor behavior, and negative symptoms such as lack of emotion, loss of interest in everyday activities, or being socially withdrawn. Schizophrenia symptoms usually show up during adolescence. In men, it typically starts around early 20s, while in women it starts in the late 20s. People with schizophrenia require lifelong treatment. Early treatment is best but isn’t always the easiest.
Why is it so hard to treat?
Schizophrenia is a complicated illness to treat because we do not know the cause of it. Researchers have ideas that it is a combination of genetics, brain chemistry, and environmental factors, but are still unsure as to what causes the disorder to develop. Some believe neurotransmitters such as dopamine and glutamate may contribute to schizophrenia. Others believe it has to do with specific signaling pathways in the brain. These pathways include the Wnt signaling pathway, an important pathway in organism development Research has shown that problems with this pathway can lead to cognitive deficits in animal models, implying that it is involved in cognitive development. Problems in development may contribute to abnormalities resulting in mental disorders such as schizophrenia.